‘Programmatic Premium’: All in the Eye of the Beholder
This article is part of the Digiday Partner program. It is presented by OpenX.
The amount of online display advertising sold programmatically, and the revenue it generates, is poised to grow rapidly in the coming year, so long as buyers and sellers can agree on what defines “premium” inventory.
An OpenX/Digiday survey of more than 800 digital media buyers and sellers found that 71 percent of media buyers and sellers are trading programmatically. While publishers saw programmatic revenues rise by about 21 percent last year and expect them to rise again this year by 25 percent, they are largely unhappy with their lot.
Some 45 percent of publishers think programmatic trading benefits buyers disproportionately. Meanwhile, 38 percent of buyers think it’s fair to both sides, and 44 percent claimed not to know whether one benefits more than another.
Qasim Saifee, svp monetization platform at OpenX, presented these findings at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Scottsdale, Ariz., last week. He said, “Premium is in the eye of the beholder.” He noted that both buyers and sellers will benefit equally from the system when they can agree on the definitions underlying programmatic trading.
Publishers themselves coined the term “programmatic premium” to define the middle ground between vast quantities of “remnant” advertising and the high-end sponsorships that publishers sell through direct-sales forces. But just what defines premium might vary from client to client and from publisher to publisher.
That’s clear from the perceptions buyers and sellers have about the inventory they’re trading. According to the survey, 57 percent of publishers say they are selling remnant inventory, while only 12 percent of buyers say they are buying just remnant.
Both parties must define their terms up front, Saifee said, if there is any hope of reaching a mutually satisfying relationship via programmatic. There are, of course, other sticking points.
For technology to assist both sides of the trade, and perhaps better equal the playing field, publishers want more control over CPM pricing, and the ability to maintain their direct relationships with buyers. Buyers want more data to help inform their bids, and exposure to inventory not available elsewhere (both of which sound like the features of a private marketplace.)
Saifee concluded, “To continue to grow, programmatic [buying] needs to evolve to provide more controls to publishers and more quality inventory for buyers.”
Image via Shutterstock
‘Clearly underinvesting’: Some of the world’s biggest marketers pledge to direct more media dollars to minority-owned business
Procter & Gamble to McDonald’s, Pernod Ricard to PepsiCo, big marketers pledge to curtail media dollars that help fuel racial basis.
Paid virtual events are the new golden ticket for publishers
There are other added benefits for publishers to have ticketing on their events, beyond the revenue.
‘We do it because it’s profitable’: Ads improbably sprout on ad averse Substack
Advertising has grown into a six-figure stream of revenue for some of the subscription-focused newsletter platform's top creators.
SponsoredBrands are rethinking content strategies to make personalization pay off
When it comes to providing a differentiated customer experience, content is king; customers will not hesitate to switch to a competitor if they aren’t engaged by the information that matters most to them. Top performing brands know that they need to provide the personalized, relevant information their customers need at every point along their journey […]
Member ExclusiveDigiday Research: Publishers are much less supportive of employee voting than agencies
Agency employees are more than twice as likely to get time off to vote as their publisher counterparts.
‘Very pleasantly surprised’ Google shares results of Privacy Sandbox experiments
Google says early tests of its Federated Learning of Cohort, FLoC, proposal show potential. It now wants other companies to run their own FLoC tests.