Only a few spots left to join us for the Digiday Publishing Summit

Join us Sept. 14-16 in Miami to connect with top publishing leaders

SECURE YOUR SEAT

With presidency looming, Trump editorial products proliferate

Back when everybody thought Donald Trump was going to lose the 2016 presidential election – remember that? – publishers were wondering what they would do when they wouldn’t have an orange crush of traffic padding their monthly audience totals anymore.

But then he won, and now numerous publishers have gone all in, launching Trump-focused products to capitalize on the intrigue of a Trump presidency.

Less than two weeks after the election had concluded, Mic had launched “Navigating Trump’s America,” a newsletter written by journalist Will Drabold. One day after Trump’s first press conference, Inside, a newsletter network startup founded by Jason Calacanis, launched “Inside Trump,” a kind of synthesis and distillation of wide reporting about Trump. The week of his inauguration, New York public radio station WNYC, in collaboration with Minnesota Public Radio and The Economist, will launch “Indivisible,” a national call-in show dedicated to charting the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency.

This impulse to launch a media brand focused on Trump’s agenda is not confined to the left: Two former Breitbart staffers intend to form a venture called Big League Politics.

The motivations differ for each product launched. For Inside, the decision to cover “the single most covered topic in media” deviates from its core competency, which is newsletters focusing on highly targeted topics, like drones or artificial intelligence. Work began on “Indivisible” days after New York Public Radio President Laura Walker lambasted the media for “talking to ourselves”; the show’s mission is to broaden dialogue around what Trump and his administration are doing.

“Even in the campaign, we were thinking about, how do we make sure that we really understand the breadth of the electorate, the breadth of America’s thinking?” said Jim Schachter, WNYC’s vp of news. “In some ways, this is a continuation of that coverage.”

Of course, publishers were throwing their arms around the opportunity Trump presented them back when he was still a candidate. Trumpcast, a podcast hosted by Slate Group Chairman Jacob Weisberg, quickly became one of the most downloaded podcasts in Slate’s history, and now averages more than 1 million downloads per episode; Esquire and Hearst digitally rebooted Spy Magazine, the publication that gave the sobriquet “short-fingered vulgarian” to the world. By the time fall 2016 rolled around, Trump coverage was so wide-ranging and pervasive that some papers had resorted to focusing their Trump coverage on his college career.

While still early, there is some interest from advertisers. Cory Haik, Mic’s chief strategy officer, said “Navigating Trump’s America” had drawn interest and that sponsorships would begin appearing “in the coming months”; she did not address a question about how many people receive it, saying only that the newsletter’s open rate is north of 40 percent.

These publishers seem committed to these projects over the long term. Austin Smith, Inside’s general manager, called the Trump newsletter “important work,” noting that four staffers work on it every week. WNYC has already begun work on a kind of sequel to “Indivisible” that will involve more in-depth reporting, due out later this spring.

“We don’t know what issues will be pertinent,” Schachter said. “But our premise is the one thing we can do is listen to one another.”

More in Media

For brands, the creator ambassador is becoming a creator executive

The new creator partnership brings them into the C-Suite and seeks input and strategy, like Blenders and Jordan “The Stallion” Howlett.

Media Briefing: Ads for AI agents have a measurement problem

A wave of startups is racing to solve AI ad measurement and attribution as publishers and advertisers experiment with serving ads to agents.

The winners and losers of YouTube’s view count and monetization overhaul

YouTube is changing how it measure views and raising the bar for creators to get monetized. Who wins and who loses?