The controversial ad for a right-wing group that The New York Times published online today (and in print yesterday) has been tweaked to soften its language. The ad that originally attacked “Islamic groups” now specifies “radical Islamist groups.”
The Investigative Project on Terrorism ran the takeover ad on the Times homepage this morning. Here’s how it looked then:
Here’s how it looks after the update:
“We think the phrase ‘radical Islamists’ would have been better than ‘Islamists’,” a Times spokeswoman told Digiday. “The advertiser agreed to the change and the ad has been updated on nytimes.com.”
The spokeswoman said the decision to ask for the change was made internally.
The IPT, however, said the Times demanded the change after being “inundated with customer complaints and pressure from the publisher.”
“The IPT in no way, shape or form criticizes mainstream Muslims or Islam,” the IPT said in a statement provided this evening. “The ad specifically lauds those Muslim voices who criticize the radicals.”
Clicking on the ad takes readers to the IPT’s site, where the organization is still using the original language.
“Thank god for small favors, I guess,” said Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said of the ad’s language change.
“We wrote a letter to the Times and basically said, the worst thing he said about us was we refused to link Islam to terrorism,” Hooper added. “We love Islam and we believe it is not linked to terrorism.”
CAIR pointed out in its letter to the times that IPT’s Steven Emerson is “the ‘expert’ who claimed the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was a reflection of ‘a Middle Eastern trait.'”
Emerson had also attacked CAIR, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, for asserting that “Islam is not the problem; extremism and violent extremism is the problem” when it comes to terrorism.
Media Briefing: The case for and against monthly and annual subscriptions in the battle for retention
There are no one-size-fits-all solutions for improving retention in a subscriptions business. While annual subscribers might stick around longer for some, other publishers will have better luck with monthly plans.
Digiday+ Research: The economy will hit the media and marketing industries this year, but differently
The economy will plague both the media and marketing industries in 2023, but the hit will be uneven between publishers and agencies.
Podcast ad buyers have yet to see a slowdown
Ad buyers have yet to see clients cut their podcast budgets – though the time of podcasts as the shiny new medium may be coming to an end.
SponsoredWhy Best Buy Ads sees retail media as integral to its customer-centric purpose
Sponsored by Best Buy Ads Retail media networks have become critical for marketers, with retailers investing in ways that enable advertisers to engage consumers across online and offline channels. Given the wealth of retailers’ first-party customer data and measurement capabilities, retail media networks have become a natural fit for augmenting performance marketing programs. Alongside the […]
The programmatic open marketplace is faltering, but publishers see a bright spot in private programmatic deals
Publishers are coming to terms with their open programmatic marketplace RPMs being 20-55% lower than they were this time last year, but the hope is that programmatic guaranteed deals will make up the deficit.
Marketers weigh the cons of working with Google Ad Manager amid Justice Department’s new lawsuit
When is it time to back away?