The controversial ad for a right-wing group that The New York Times published online today (and in print yesterday) has been tweaked to soften its language. The ad that originally attacked “Islamic groups” now specifies “radical Islamist groups.”
The Investigative Project on Terrorism ran the takeover ad on the Times homepage this morning. Here’s how it looked then:
Here’s how it looks after the update:
“We think the phrase ‘radical Islamists’ would have been better than ‘Islamists’,” a Times spokeswoman told Digiday. “The advertiser agreed to the change and the ad has been updated on nytimes.com.”
The spokeswoman said the decision to ask for the change was made internally.
The IPT, however, said the Times demanded the change after being “inundated with customer complaints and pressure from the publisher.”
“The IPT in no way, shape or form criticizes mainstream Muslims or Islam,” the IPT said in a statement provided this evening. “The ad specifically lauds those Muslim voices who criticize the radicals.”
Clicking on the ad takes readers to the IPT’s site, where the organization is still using the original language.
“Thank god for small favors, I guess,” said Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said of the ad’s language change.
“We wrote a letter to the Times and basically said, the worst thing he said about us was we refused to link Islam to terrorism,” Hooper added. “We love Islam and we believe it is not linked to terrorism.”
CAIR pointed out in its letter to the times that IPT’s Steven Emerson is “the ‘expert’ who claimed the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was a reflection of ‘a Middle Eastern trait.'”
Emerson had also attacked CAIR, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, for asserting that “Islam is not the problem; extremism and violent extremism is the problem” when it comes to terrorism.
Dentsu’s new Web3 readiness tool shines light on the tech’s potential to complement AI
Dentsu's Innovation Initiative is launching a web3 readiness index next month — at a time when the industry is obsessed with AI. Could the two technologies actually make a good pair?
Digiday+ Research deep dive: Publishers large and small put their resources into first-party data
Eighty-two percent of publishers overall say they're already using first-party data to prepare for the end of the third-party cookie, and nearly half are requiring users to register and integrating first-party data segments into DSPs – indicating that first-party data is the clear path forward for publishers heading into the post-cookie world.
Media Briefing: Why publishers hope chatbots will be the latest retention tool
Publishers hope the chatbots they are developing will be the latest retention tool to keep readers onsite and to get them to consume more content.
SponsoredHow enterprise-grade CDPs are enhancing data processes and improving customer experiences
Produced in partnership with Marketecture The following article highlights an interview between Martin Kihn, Salesforce’s senior vice president of Marketing Cloud, and Ari Paparo, founder and CEO of Marketecture Media. Register to watch more of the discussion and learn how brands are making the most of enterprise-grade CDP technologies. As brands expand across channels and […]
How programmatic advertising will evolve this year on the heels of audio growth and privacy changes
Comscore’s programmatic division Proximic released a State of Programmatic study highlighting the growth of audio and podcasting, other digital advertising channels and challenges around third-party data.
Why podcasters are selling subscriptions through third-party vendors
Many podcasters are turning to third party platforms like Supporting Cast and Supercast to launch or grow their subscription businesses beyond Spotify or Apple.