Europe has been abuzz this week as details on the new EU Data Protection Laws have been hammered out after four years of negotiating and lobbying.
Tuesday evening marked a historic moment in which the final “trilogue” (Brussels speak for discussion) between the European Commission, European Parliament and Ministry of Justice and Affairs, took place, resulting in a new law designed to give consumers more control over how their data is used by businesses, which all of Europe must implement in 2018.
The general consensus is the laws will be bad for media and advertising. Ad tech companies are likely to be among those hardest hit. The IAB Europe has called the update a “setback for Europe” that could seriously undermine the EU’s ambitious project to create a “digital single market” and hurt innovation and growth in Europe.
We’ve broken out some of the key issues for those who aren’t familiar with the process.
Why does this even exist?
The current EU data protection directive is two decades old. Everyone agrees the laws should be modernized, but nobody can agree on how to create a simple process for businesses that works across all 28 EU member states. Welcome to Europe.
Is this different from the EU cookie directive?
It’s much bigger. A directive is a law each EU member state can customize to fit the status quo in their individual markets. Markets that are more advanced in digital needn’t apply the same exact rules as those that have tougher privacy policies such as, for example, Germany. The new data protection doesn’t have that kind of wiggle room.
How does it affect businesses?
Companies must prove legal grounds for using consumer data, which they can obtain by getting consumer consent. The law, which covers all companies with services available in the European Union, has specified “unambiguous” consent is acceptable, to the relief of the IAB. For example, if you click through a site that drops cookies, you’ve implicitly given consent to have cookies dropped on your computer. No one had to ask you for that consent. The Commission provides the caveat that explicit consent must be given for the use of “sensitive” data.
What’s the problem with it?
In the initial draft, the term “personal data” lumped all data into one bucket, meaning a person’s cookie data used in online advertising would have been subject to the same privacy terms as medical data. The IAB and DMA have lobbied unsuccessfully for more granularity in the definition.
Who will be worst off?
The companies that should be most worried are those that don’t have a direct relationship with the consumer — hello, ad tech. Companies like Criteo or AppNexus, for example, can’t communicate directly to consumers. Even if they could, consumers aren’t likely to recognize their brands and would likely decline.
What are the ramifications for publishers?
Publishers that rely on third parties to sell huge volumes of inventory will suffer. If the intermediaries can’t collect data for targeted advertising, publishers will lose out on revenue and could be “forced” to explore alternative revenue streams or cut costs to offset the lower ad revenues.
Who are the potential winners here?
Google, Facebook and Amazon could do well from the situation because they have the direct relationship with their customers across numerous devices. Independent publishers that lose ad revenue from the fallout may flock to products like Facebook’s Instant Articles and compromise on an ad revenue share but avoid the costs associated with gaining the right compliance, one source speculated.
Will there be fines?
Oh yes. The scale of the fine will depend on the size of the offense and on the annual turnover of the company. The maximum penalty will be 4 percent of global sales revenue.
Podcasters are pitching longer, more lucrative ads, but ad buyers prefer shorter, cheaper spots
While podcast production companies and creative studios pitch custom, longer-form podcast ads, buyers prefer ads under a minute long due to budgets, reach and audience attention.
Media Buying Briefing: Four takeaways on Upfront Week from a buyer’s perspective
Beyond a general optimism to be back in person for Upfront Week, buyers shared their thoughts on what worked and what still needs to happen.
How publishers are future proofing their commerce offerings for post-pandemic consumers
Four publishers gathered at Digiday Media's Commerce for Publishers Forum to talk about their affiliate programs and strategies.
SponsoredHow marketers and retailers are unlocking the true value of retail media
Ben Kneen, senior director of product management, Xandr It’s a challenging time for retailers in the advertising industry. As they cope with supply chain woes and inflation-related pressures, they seek high-margin revenue streams amid evolving privacy regulations and massive shifts in identity solutions — including IDFA, the deprecation of third-party cookies and more. In light […]
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: Publishers and media unions are still haggling over office-return plans heading into the summer
In this week's Media Briefing, senior media reporter Sara Guaglione reports on how unions at some major media companies are pushing back against publishers' return to office mandates, with The New York Times Guild seemingly netting a victory on Wednesday.
‘He thought I was accusing him of being racist’: Confessions of a comms pro on working with out of touch leadership
The [CEO] and one of the other co-founders felt the need to point out that they mentor black people and donate to black-focused charities. 'It wasn't about them, but they were making it about them.'