Condé Nast is the latest publisher to join the war on ad blocking. Its GQ magazine is preventing people using ad blockers from accessing its site with a popup asking them to disable their ad blockers or pay 50 cents to read an article.
GQ isn’t the first publication to take a hard line in forcing people to disable their ad blockers. Forbes has a message on its welcome screen asking people to turn off their ad blockers in order to access the site (but to soften the blow, it’s promising an ad-light version of the site in exchange).
Other publishers have taken a gentler approach, serving friendly messages to ad block users asking them to disable their ad blockers.
For the payment part, GQ is using CoinTent, a micropayment system started earlier this year that lets publishers charge for access to an article or video. Once you click the pay button, you’re prompted to set up an account with a digital wallet that’s designed to make it easy to buy content around the Web. CoinTent’s site also lists another Condé Nast site Epicurious as a client. GQ and Condé Nast haven’t responded to requests for comment.
Ad blocking has become a major concern among mainstream publishers this past year as consumers, fed up with ads clogging their surfing experience and worried about their online privacy, have begun ad blocking in big numbers. Ad blocking means lost revenue for publishers as it means fewer eyeballs to sell ads against.
More in Media
Digiday+ Research: How social platforms stack up for publishers
To find out where different social platforms stand with publishers, Digiday+ Research surveyed publisher professionals on their social media usage and ad spend, and how social platforms play into their revenues and branding.
From power play to courtroom drama: a timeline of tumultuous turns to Google’s ad tech trial
Google implores authorities to “let’s not break what’s working” as its hour of judgement nears closer.
Google’s ad tech impact on publishers front and center during opening day of DOJ’s antitrust trial
If someone’s loss is another’s gain, then Google owes publishers a fat check — or at the very least, an apology letter with interest.