The Financial Times buries developer job post in its new site’s code

The Financial Times has come up with an ingenious way to recruit its next batch of developer interns: The publisher is hiding the application form in the HTML code its new site.

Toggle to the original source code from the FT’s homepage and the application can be found underneath the recognizable FT letters written out in dummy code. It reads: “Graduate? Hello! You’ve been inquisitive enough to find a link to our graduate scheme application,” with a link to the application form for the FT’s Technology Graduate Application 2017.

“Putting a job ad in the HTML comments tags means it’ll only be found by people curious enough to look at the site’s source code,” said Andrew Girdwood, head of media technology at agency Cello Signal. “Anyone can do that but people rarely do.”

This isn’t the first time newspapers have used the tactic. Girdwood cites the Daily Mail in 2010, which put a job advert for a search engine optimization manager in their robots.txt file. “That’s an obscure location where only other SEOs and search engines tend to look.”

The FT’s application is an example of a publisher easter egg, something hidden but meant to be found, albeit designed for recruitment. Condé Nast’s snuck dinosaur pop-ups onto its sites for Vogue, Wired and GQ that would materialize when readers typed the Konami Code on their sites.

The only reason more publishers don’t play with them, theorized Girdwood, is due to “the usual silos between developers and everyone else in the organization, and making the business case for it.”

Update: Since writing this article the FT has responded to say that it accepts two applicants each year for the technology graduate program, which started in 2015, and for the 2016 intake, a third of those who applied did so via the post hidden in the source code of the new homepage.

The FT draws in skilled developers by hiding its grad application form in code.

Image courtesy of Steven Johnson/Flickr.

More in Media

News publishers hesitate to commit to investing more into Threads next year despite growing engagement

News publishers are cautious to pour more resources into Threads, as limited available data makes it difficult to determine whether investing more into the platform is worth it.

privacy sandbox

WTF is Google’s Protected Audience?

FLEDGE stands for ‘First Locally-Executed Decision over Groups Experiment’ and makes ad auction decisions in the browser, rather than at ad server level.

Digiday’s History of Ad Tech: In the beginning …

A look at the genesis of ad tech, from the first online display ad in 1994 to the dotcom crash.