Facebook has been hard at work, separating the wheat from the chaff of advertising on its news feed. Now, the latest change could keep advertisers from reaching their desired audiences.
The social network announced on Thursday that users will now be asked to provide feedback as to why they “hid” an ad from their news feed. That capability was initially rolled out as a test weeks ago, the results of which showed many users were hiding ads because they found them “offensive or inappropriate,” according to a Facebook blog post.
Facebook will also start using this feedback to inform its ad targeting: If an ad is being consistently hidden and receiving a significant amount of negative feedback, then Facebook will refrain from serving that ad to other users.
“We absolutely welcome this change,” Ben Winkler, chief digital officer at media agency OMD, said. “Crummy, irrelevant ads are bad for everybody, and they’re especially insidious in a social feed.”
While the change is likely to improve the quality of ads on Facebook, it could produce frustrations for advertisers and their agencies. Limiting the reach of unpopular ads will ostensibly motivate brands and agencies to improve their campaigns, specifically as they pertain to Facebook. But it could potentially prevent certain brands from being able to serve ads to the people they were hoping to reach.
Facebook, for its part, is not concerned about this change frustrating its advertisers. The initial test did not have a significant effect on ad reach, Facebook wrote in an email to Digiday. Besides, advertisers want to run ads that perform well, and this will help their cause, right?
“Hiding ads isn’t a natural behavior for most Facebook users, so this isn’t likely to yield a significant amount of data,” according to Matt Wurst, general manager of social media at digital agency 360i. “On the flipside, this feedback should help marketers combine creative and media to create content experiences that people want to engage with.”
Facebook will not tell advertisers which of their ads are being hidden, how often certain ads are being hidden and how those “hides” are affecting ad targeting. Rather, advertisers will have to suss out their bad ads indirectly by looking at their analytics, to see which ads are performing well and optimize to those.
So advertisers could, in theory, spend money to target an ad at a certain demographic but be still denied access to those users if their ads are hidden with some frequency.
“This is one of a series of Facebook ad changes that encourage advertisers to create more awesome ads with more awesome targeting,” Winkler said. “The alternative is that no one will see your ad at all.”
Facebook is making sure this system will not be ruined by trolls, though. Feedback from users who rarely hide ads from their news feed will be weighed more heavily than those from serial ad hiders.
The social network has taken numerous steps over the past year to improve the quality of the news feed, even at the expense of its agency relationships. Facebook changed its new feed algorithm to show more “high-quality content” and weed out spam over the last year, which contributed to decreased organic reach for many brands. Facebook’s change to sponsored stories earlier this year was also seen as a message to improve ad quality.
The move will further pressure agencies and brands into taking Facebook more seriously in terms of creativity, but the lack of transparency regarding how those ads resonate with users could become an issue.
If Facebook’s past changes are any barometer, the change might cause some short-term frustrations but will ultimately be embraced.
“Facebook obviously has a long play here as well: The more relevant the ads are, the more ads a user is willing to see,” Winkler said. “Relevance equals revenue.”
Image via Shutterstock
For many influencers, speaking out on Roe v. Wade is an obvious choice
Influencers are concerned about losing potential brand deals because they don’t want to work with those that don’t share their values on choice.
Gannett reviews employee blowback to social media policy memo after Roe overturn
After receiving criticism for forbidding its journalists from posting opinions on the Supreme Court striking down Roe last week, Gannett is reviewing employee perspectives.
Companies turn to employee resource groups to manage internal discourse around the abortion ruling
Companies are using ERGs to facilitate employee conversations, as well as executive leadership via companywide emails to employees stressing their support for wellbeing and the availability of managers for support.
SponsoredWhy the caliber of content is paramount for advertisers
Agata Brodniewska, brand safety manager, Dailymotion Content is king when attracting consumers but is equally essential when courting advertisers. While both stakeholders want many of the same things, they most notably want relevant content they can count on to deliver an accurate and honest message without confusion or misinformation. This is especially important for advertisers […]
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: The pros and cons of three commerce pricing models
In this week’s Media Briefing, media editor Kayleigh Barber breaks down the different pricing models that commerce publishers use.
Bloomberg Green’s expansion increases its service-oriented coverage
Bloomberg's climate vertical is adding new products and coverage areas to lean into solutions-oriented journalism.