Digiday Research: Publishers estimate their ad-tech tax at around 20 percent
Middlemen and ad tech vendors syphon off between 10 and 50 percent of every dollar spent on programmatic advertising on publishers’ sites, according to Digiday research.
In a survey of 186 publishing executives involved with programmatic ad selling conducted in November of 2018, 46 percent estimated that vendors and middlemen take between 10 to 24 percent of ever ad dollar an advertiser tries to spend with them. Twenty-nine percent of respondents estimated that number at between 25 and 49 percent.
Programmatic advertising is dependent on a convoluted chain tech vendors to facilitate the buying and selling of ads between advertisers and publishers. Typically, each vendor receives a percentage of the media fee to pay for their services in what is known as the “take rate’ or “ad-tech tax.”
Because of the opacity and complexity of this system, it’s extremely difficult for publishers to know what advertisers intended to spend on their inventory, compared with what those publishers actually receive. Publishers know it’s a problem, but they don’t know how big it is.
Estimates for the typical “ad-tech tax” can vary. Research from WARC estimated it to be as high as 60 percent, even without fraud rates being taken into account. Ad fraud can increase the tax further because illegitimate actors are stealing spending intended for publishes by using tactics like pretending to represent them in programmatic exchanges. 
Each vendor publishers work with promises to deliver incremental value, and it’s extremely difficult for publishers to understand the margins that vendors, like DPS’s, are taking from trading desks and agencies. But in attempt to mitigate the fees they’re paying, some publishers are attempting to reduce the number of vendors and middlemen they work with.
-
The Washington Post hopes to bring in young, diverse readers with a cross-company task force
The "Next Generation" task force will work to figure out new products, partnerships and initiatives to draw in more readers who are young and from around the country and the world.
-
California Attorney General says popular, digital ad opt-outs from trade groups don’t comply with CCPA
Commonly used opt-out tools from the Network Advertising Initiative and Digital Advertising Alliance will not suffice for compliance with California's privacy law.
-
Hearst UK wants all of its brands to have Good Housekeeping’s authority in product testing
The Good Housekeeping Institute set the precedent for Hearst UK and the new Hearst Institute is looking to replicate those successes across all its brands.
-
SponsoredData-driven solutions: Charting a better way forward for brands and publishers
Travis Clinger, senior vp of addressability and ecosystem, LiveRamp Updates to mobile identifiers and browser data privacy policies have become an everyday part of life in the advertising industry. The browsers and device manufacturers have made privacy a competitive differentiator, as consumers have become increasingly concerned over how their data is being used. As an […]
-
Member ExclusiveDigiday Research: The pandemic sped the wrong things up for publishers
Publishers are now much more reliant on direct-sold ads, and at an industry level, diversification strategies have made little progress.
-
Why two brothers are betting on creating new brands and e-commerce to grow their media company
Former Bonnier Corp. CEO Eric Zinczenko is the new COO/president of his brother David Zinczenko's company Galvanized Media.
