There’s an irony that the communications business has a communication problem. A chief complaint often heard from ad sellers is ad buyers are remote, mercurial and slow to respond, if they’re heard from at all. It was a thread in our recent “Confessions” series article with an ad sales executive.
Digiday decided to poll ad sellers with the help of SellerCrowd, a Q&A platform for the ad-sales community. SellerCrowd used the LinkedIn API to validate members, so we can be sure the respondents are actually sellers of digital media. The question posed to them was: “What percentage of your RFP submission receive no response?” The results from 214 respondents showed 65 percent of ad sellers don’t hear back more than half the time when they answer requests for proposals. Only 14 percent answered, “I usually get responses.”
The RFP is a hallowed (maybe that should be hated) part of the ad-sales process. Agencies issue them to a wide range of publishers when putting together a plan. The first step to getting on a plan is getting an RFP. The problem: Ad sellers never get feedback on why they didn’t get on the plan.
“It’s a big problem because it only exacerbates the visibility issue,” said Randy Kilgore, chief revenue officer at Tremor Video. “Not only do people not plan digital far ahead, but without feedback, each month can be a crapshoot.”
Kilgore is a sales veteran, having held down top positions at ESPN and The Wall Street Journal. He’s not being nostalgic for the olden days. For him, the issue is structural and inevitable. Agencies pile on work to media planners in too short of a time period. The RFP process is a blunt instrument. But he also isn’t ready to just blame one side.
“Sellers are to blame, too,” he noted. “The proliferation of people trying to generate ad sales is over the top. So many are scrapping for dollars. Getting an RFP is a way to show your manager you’re doing something. So sellers sometimes push too hard just to get that RFP even when they probably don’t deserve it.”
More in Media
The Rundown: Google has drawn its AI payment lines — and publishers’ leverage is narrow
For publishers trying to navigate AI licensing, the message was blunt: Google is willing to pay for access, but not for training – and it remains unwilling to define AI Overviews as a compensable use of journalism.
Media Briefing: Google’s latest core update a reminder that pageviews can’t remain the primary metric
Google’s latest core update signals pageviews can no longer be the primary metric, favoring intent-solving publishers over scale.
After an oversaturation of AI-generated content, creators’ authenticity and ‘messiness’ are in high demand
Content creators and brand marketing specialists on how 2026 will be the year creator authenticity becomes even more crucial in the face of rampant AI-generated “slop” flooding social media platforms.