Make it independent: The reason why these companies are willing to explore a joint venture with their competitors is that all three have badly missed the product cycle of real-time bidding and they are starting to feel significant pain in their core businesses as a result. A classic innovator’s dilemma is what caused this to happen. RTB as a standard creates numerous issues for their sacred cow of high-priced premium inventory and they have understandably hoped it would fail. Now that it has become clear to even them that RTB is becoming the new online buying standard, they realize they must do something. Yet the cultures of their organizations have been so opposed to RTB for so long that politics will kill any internal effort. Only an independent entity with its own P&L and equity structure has any hope of escaping the long knives. Joint ventures between competitors don’t have a great history in the media industry, but Hulu showed they can sometimes work quite well.
Build or buy new technology: An attempt to repurpose existing technologies such as Right Media is a bad idea. It is simply too late for any of their display technology solutions, as the innovation in the RTB space over the last three years has made all fundamentally obsolete. The reason why they are in this difficult spot is because their existing technology didn’t keep up, and adopting antiquated technology would doom this effort from the very start.
Make it an ecosystem: Incentivizing the rest of the industry to support this venture would be one of the smartest things they could do. A very easy way to do this is to structure the entity like a stock exchange where the participants own the exchange. If they simply enabled other media companies to get an ownership stake in exchange for committing impressions and startup capital, they could very quickly build a very sizable entity able to compete with Google. Creating such an exchange with diversified ownership would also go a long way to allaying the concerns many have about singular owners of exchanges also being participants a la Google.
This industry is too important for one player to dominate. I hope the Big Three can get their acts together and provide a needed credible alternative.
Zach Coelius is CEO of Triggit, a demand-side platform. Follow him on Twitter @zachcoelius.
WTF is cookie stuffing?
Fraud is a well-documented pox on digital advertising, but it’s also an issue for publishers and marketers working together on affiliate marketing deals, too. One of the more tried-and-true techniques is cookie stuffing.
Publishers report Q1 ad revenue is pacing 10-25% behind forecasts
Publishers are facing a slow start to Q1 and sales teams have a lot of work to do to regain lost time.
Bloomberg, Axios, Politico, other business publishers rethink subscriber retention during the economic downturn
Premium publishers, like POLITICO, Axios and Bloomberg, have to make sure their fees are still considered a necessity as readers recalculate their spending and companies recalculate their expense budgets.
SponsoredHow ad tech is tackling waste by optimizing supply chains
Sponsored by Bidtellect The programmatic and digital advertising industry is well aware of the inefficiencies in buying and selling — from auction duplication and volume bias to multi-integrations and reselling — but how did it get this out of control? How can we fix it? A redundant, multiple-step process to ad delivery has become the norm, […]
Why Vice, BBC, WaPo, others see new TikTok teams as the next wave of specialist publishing talent
As news publishers craft their TikTok strategies, Digiday spoke with the BBC, Vice, The Washington Post and LADbible to see who’s really behind the posts.
Digiday+ Research deep dive: Publishers anticipate a big drop in ad revenue this year
Digiday's survey found that publishers are not feeling great about advertising revenue as 2023 kicks off, with attitudes toward subscriptions and e-commerce shifting as well.