Hating advertising is nothing new. No one wants their entertainment interrupted by a 30-second spot with someone sputtering on about a product you have no use for. But The New York Times would have you believe otherwise, as a story this week based off a new report from Forrester, stated people’s hatred of advertising as a new phenomenon — and one that’s dangerous for advertisers and ad agencies who face an existential threat if people hate the business that they’re in.
The mishmash of issues the Times illustrated — that marketers want more for less, that agencies don’t have the power they once did, that marketing is being run in-house at some companies, that consultancies are taking a bite out of agencies — also aren’t new problems. Advertising is a more difficult business to be in now but treating people’s hatred of ads as something new is naïve.
Of course, the ad industry will tell you that your hatred of those ads comes from its irrelevance to you. Advertisers and agency execs believe the solve for people who hate ads is to create ads that are better targeted and that are actually useful. To do that advertisers need more data about you and your habits. In the end, handing over that data will benefit you, because the ads will be better, don’t you see?
There’s been a reckoning of sorts in recent years as advertisers like P&G’s Marc Pritchard and execs like Yext’s Marc Ferrentino have used industry events to lament the state of the advertising industry. “We’ve been shoving ads in people’s faces,” said Ferrentino earlier this week. “We’re almost in an arms race to be annoying.” There’s even been a movement among creatives to make self-aware advertising about how people hate ads (for example: look at any Oatly ad).
But talking about ads being annoying or making ads about how ads are annoying doesn’t change anything.
Advertisers and agencies are hellbent on the idea that creating better advertising will make people hate ads less. But in recent years, with ad blockers and Netflix and paying for Hulu or Spotify without ads, people have become accustomed to the idea that there can be a world without advertising — that they can get their entertainment without the interruption. If the ability to opt-out of advertising is available, people are going to take that option. It’s a better experience — and not one that better ads — Cannes Lions creative or not — is going to solve.
More in Marketing
Future of Marketing Briefing: Accenture’s Whalar bet: own the room when creator marketing gets complicated
The Whalar deal is Accenture running the same play it ran on programmatic — only this time it got there earlier.
How DUDE Wipes turned to unconventional sponsorships after sports inventory prices surged
As sports sponsorship costs rise, brands like DUDE Wipes are turning to emerging leagues and unconventional placements.
Agency AI pitches are starting to face harder questions
As agencies race to sell proprietary AI the future of marketing, 3C Ventures argues advertisers need more proof.