The rise of ‘micro-influencers’ on Instagram
There’s such a thing as being too popular.
It turns out that once a social media influencer reaches a critical mass of followers, audience engagement actually begins to decrease. A survey of 2 million social media influencers by influencer marketing platform Markerly showed that for unpaid posts, Instagram influencers with fewer than 1,000 followers have a like rate of about 8 percent, while those with 1,000 to 10,000 followers have a like rate of 4 percent.
As following base continues to increase, like rate keeps decreasing. Instagram influencers with 10,000 to 100,000 followers see a 2.4 percent like rate, compared to 1.7 percent for those with 1 million to 10 million followers and more. Comment rate follows a similar pattern.
The findings apply to sponsored Instagram posts, too, which suggests the sweet spot for maximum impact is an influencer with a following in the 10,000 to 100,000 range. Call them “micro-influencers.”
Sarah Ware, CEO and co-founder of Markerly, said that when her company engaged with the Jenner and Kardashian sisters on Instagram on behalf of a weight-loss tea company, the celebrities helped bring hundreds of conversions. Which was nice. But by activating 30 to 40 “micro-influencers,” the brand was able to convert at an even higher level.
It’s a simple math. If a sportswear company, for example, collaborates with a social celebrity with 2 million followers, it can reach a big pool of audience, but 90 percent of them may not be sports fans. It would make more sense to activate 100 self-proclaimed athletes whose followers are actually interested in athletics.
While the ultimate payoff may be greater, it’s still more work for brands, conceded Ware. A celebrity, she said, is a highly visible one-stop-shop. “In comparison, brands need to find a proper search engine to identify ‘micro-influencers’ quickly.”
The idea of micro-influencers has already been gaining traction at some agencies. Fergus Thomas, co-founder of social marketing agency Irban Group, used the term “power middle influencers” to describe social media users who typically have around 100,000 to 200,000 followers. Creating content for a brand is still secondary to their full-time profession, so they post sponsored content less often than social celebrities. And thus they feel more authentic. “With the same amount of budget, brands can collaborate with 20 or 40 ‘power middle influencers’ to reach different demographics and see better engagement, compared to one or two celebrities.”
Social ad platform Gnack, on the other hand, defines everyday social media users with fewer than 10,000 followers as micro-influencers. Their followers usually consist of their friends and family, so their posts are much more trustworthy and engaging.
“More than 55 percent of our agency partners have incorporated ‘micro-influencers’ as a part of their [current] strategy,” said Chico Tirado, the company’s chief revenue officer. “We’ve seen some ‘micro-influencers’ on certain campaigns get up to 25 percent engagement.”
As Instagram recently changed its algorithm to favor quality content, Gnack’s CEO Chris Gonzalez predicted that posts from “micro-influencers” will become more visible on the platform. After all, content from friends and family members is often prioritized by any social network.
“We see micro-influencers get an average of two-to-five times more organic engagement per Instagram post, compared to those with more than 100,000 followers,” said Gonzalez. “Their content will be organically performing better on the platform due to the inherent superior engagement.”
‘Influencer deals are being paused’: As Facebook boycott begins in earnest, influencer marketing feels a sting
The latest move to pause influencer marketing comes as marketers are not only reconsidering where their ads appear and the kind of content they appear next to, but as they work to figure out how they can better support Black creators and Black-owned businesses following the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.
As Facebook boycott continues, here’s a look at what major marketers were spending on Facebook and Instagram
To get a sense of how much advertisers are pulling back from Facebook, Digiday reached out to ad-tracking firm Pathmatics. The company provided estimates for how much advertisers spent on the platform during July 2019 as well as from July 2019 to 2020.
Member Exclusive‘Performative posting’: As agencies share their equality values online, staffers say they have to do much more for Black employees than post
Agency employees and execs say agencies need to do more than make statements to be better for Black employees.
SponsoredFour ways to adapt to the changing publisher ecosystem in 2020
By Neal Sinno, general manager Americas at GeoEdge For marketers, 2020 started out with so much promise — but this changed rapidly as the industry faced a global epidemic head-on. Not only did our own daily routines come to a screeching halt, for many of us our professional lives did as well. Almost as quickly […]
‘Don’t want to piss off customers’: With manufacturing and exporting snarled, some DTC brands are adapting their advertising
Media buyers say that supply chain hiccups have caused them to pause or significantly reduce media spending anywhere from two weeks to five weeks for some DTC brands low on product inventory.
Beyond remote work: Bringing serendipity back to the office
This article is part of the Future of Work briefing, a weekly email with stories, interviews, trends and links about how work, workplaces and workforces are changing. Sign up here. Kai Micah Mills had been working in a different state from his work partner for years. More recently, though, his partner, Ben Adamsky, made the move […]