Jello Makes Popular FML Hashtag G-Rated

It’s common practice for brands to try to insert themselves into social media conversations via trending topics and hashtags on Twitter. But rarely do brands pull this maneuver off in a clever, entertaining way — usually it just reeks of cheesy desperation. Jello is the latest brand to unsuccessfully try its hand at the hashtag hijack.

Everyone knows the popular saying/hashtag/shorthand “FML”– for all of you who don’t, it stands for “fuck my life.” People usually attach these three letters to the end of tweets or Facebook posts about things that just aren’t going their way. Jello for some unknown reason has taken it upon itself to turn FML into something positive and “fun.” The brand has started a “Fun My Life” campaign to respond to all of those glum people tweeting things out with the #FML hashtag.

Jello responded to select FML tweeters with cheesy responses and lame gifts. For example, in response to Katie Shueman’s tweet about the toilet overflowing, Jello responded with:

 

Jello has collected some of its FML tweet responses on its Jello Fun My Life site. They are all awkward and cheesy. I don’t think anyone anywhere ever thought to themselves, “Hey, I really wish a brand would come up with a response to some of my FML tweets.” Especially not with kindergarten-style messaging about “fun!” Brands, please don’t impose yourselves on hashtags. It’s never a good look.

 

Image via Shutterstock

More in Marketing

Future of Marketing Briefing: Accenture’s Whalar bet: own the room when creator marketing gets complicated

The Whalar deal is Accenture running the same play it ran on programmatic — only this time it got there earlier.

How DUDE Wipes turned to unconventional sponsorships after sports inventory prices surged

As sports sponsorship costs rise, brands like DUDE Wipes are turning to emerging leagues and unconventional placements.

Agency AI pitches are starting to face harder questions

As agencies race to sell proprietary AI the future of marketing, 3C Ventures argues advertisers need more proof.