Katherine Heigl’s Duane Reade lawsuit exposes legal murkiness of brand tweets
Duane Reade’s social media manager is probably not feeling so hot right now.
The pharmacy chain is being sued by Katherine Heigl, the “highly successful television and motion picture actress, producer and celebrity,” as she describes herself in the suit, for tweeting out a paparazzi image of her leaving a franchise with Duane Reade bags in her hands. The offending tweet, for which Heigl is demanding $6 million in damages, included the caption “Love a quick #DuaneReade run? Even @KatieHeigl can’t resist shopping #NYC’s favorite drugstore.”
This lawsuit demonstrates why brands need to be extremely careful with their social media output. The employees manning their Twitter feeds have the challenging task of quickly coming up with engaging, on-brand social media content while also staying within the limits of the law — and when it comes to social media, what’s legal and what’s not can get a little murky. The question here is whether the tweet implied a celeb endorsement.
As Jeffrey Greenbaum, manager partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein + Selz and global president of the Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance, explained, celebs — like all people — have a “right of publicity,” meaning that in most cases, a company cannot use the name or likeness of a celeb for advertising purposes without permission. If the case goes to trial, the courts will now be forced to consider whether a company’s tweets should be considered advertising.
“Celebrities don’t lose the right to control the use of their identity for advertising purposes just because they’re caught by the paparazzi coming out of a store or holding a branded product,” said Greenbaum. “This lawsuit raises the important question of whether all speech by a brand over social media constitutes advertising.”
If the “27 Dresses” star wins the suit, she says she will donate the money to the Jason Debus Heigl Foundation for animal welfare. Duane Reade hasn’t directly addressed the issue on Twitter, however, the brand did retweet this approved celeb endorsement from Piers Morgan:
“This is one of the early lawsuits,” said Greenbaum. “We can expect that there will be many more that will cause courts to take a serious look at how brands are using social media.”
‘The most influential people aren’t on social’: Why amplification is not key to Team Epiphany’s influencer strategy
In the latest episode of Digiday's weekly show The New Normal, Coltrane Curtis talks about his company's unique influencer marketing strategy.
‘We’re letting Facebook grade their own homework’: Here’s how advertisers’ desired changes differ from overall boycott
The overall goals of civil rights advocates organizing the boycott differ slightly from those of advertisers.
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.
SponsoredWhy data clean rooms are a start, but not enough
Clean rooms are intended to be a “safe space” for brands to collaborate with walled gardens, but the greater opportunity for all brands is bringing together all of their data to create a single source of truth that they own and can continually enrich.
Member Exclusive‘Are you going to put people over profit?’: As Facebook boycott continues, DTCs still running ads on the platform in a tricky spot
The Facebook boycott is part of a larger cultural shift towards a more “values-based consumerism.”
WTF is California’s new, and potentially stronger, privacy law?
In November, California residents will vote on the state's second privacy law, which is basically the CCPA 2.0