Digiday Research: Social media dominates distribution for content marketing
In August, we gathered a group of retail and brand executives in Vail, Colorado, for the Digiday Content Marketing Summit. The main topic of discussion: Where does content marketing go from here?
During the summit, we asked speakers and attendees from brands like Reebok, Heineken and Urban Zen about the types of content they’re creating, whether they’re outsourcing work or keeping it in-house and whether or not they can realistically expect content to drive conversions.
Thinking outside the sponsored post
“Content marketing isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s a must-have,” said one attendee. But what format works best? While articles don’t take a lot of time or money to write, marketers fear readers have developed blinders when they encounter the word “sponsored” on their favorite sites.
“When you’re selling a product and you’re not editorial, but you’re trying to create content people actually want to read, we fear that people are going to immediately bounce the second they realize they’re reading sponsored content or brand content,” said one marketer at the event.
To capture attention, content marketers are investing in new formats. Nearly half of the attendees said 40 percent or more of the content they create is something other than a sponsored post.
When asked to select the types of content they’re producing, almost every attendee said they’re investing in social media and video. Sixty-nine percent said they’re still writing sponsored posts.
Questioning Facebook’s motives
Social media is the most important marketing channel for a majority of attendees. But that doesn’t mean figuring out how to please Facebook’s ever-changing algorithm has gotten any easier.
“Just because we put up a great Facebook video, it’s not that someone says, ‘Oh, I’ll go buy.’ There’s a lot more involved in that,” said one marketer, who added that the money spent on creating video and then promoting it on Facebook is a big budget suck.
It’s not just Facebook: Platforms across the board are black boxes of data. One attendee said LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook all have discrepancies in the data they share with brands, inconsistent with the metrics that brands get internally or through third-party partners.
Regardless of confusion around metrics and a general lack of trust for the platforms’ ultimate motives, social media is by far the first place brands go when they want to promote their content.
Who’s the boss?
Brands face a constant question: to go in-house, or not to go in-house?
Discussion at the conference shed light on two sides of the question. When brands work with agencies on developing content and creating campaigns, they get a valuable outsider perspective that can save brands from living in an echo chamber. (“Just look at what happened to Pepsi,” one attendee said.) On the other hand, many marketers asked, “Who knows our brand and can tell its story better than the people living and breathing it every day?”
The majority of attendees prefer to produce content internally. According to our survey, 70 percent of brands produce 60 percent or more of their content in-house.
And when it comes to partnering with a single publisher, the majority of brands surveyed do not keep a publisher on retainer to share its content.
Over the course of the summit, the same challenge kept coming up: How do we track conversion? And when marketers don’t want to bash audiences over the head with promotional messages, should conversion be the only metric of success?
It’s a Catch-22. If content marketers can’t prove to executives that what they do makes money, they will have to subsist on tiny budgets. But without proper resources, expectations for what content can be executed have to be managed.
“What we do costs money. Where is that money supposed to come from? A sale makes it easier to justify, but you can’t always be selling. That’s a huge turnoff,” said one marketer.
It turns out, attendees don’t always expect their work to lead to direct sales. More than half said they only expect content to lead to conversions some of the time.
“The best thing I got from this event was the message that conversion isn’t the only indicator of success for content marketing,” said one attendee. “I’m going back to the office with that message.”
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.
Member Exclusive‘Are you going to put people over profit?’: As Facebook boycott continues, DTCs still running ads on the platform in a tricky spot
The Facebook boycott is part of a larger cultural shift towards a more “values-based consumerism.”
WTF is California’s new, and potentially stronger, privacy law?
In November, California residents will vote on the state's second privacy law, which is basically the CCPA 2.0
SponsoredWhy data clean rooms are a start, but not enough
Clean rooms are intended to be a “safe space” for brands to collaborate with walled gardens, but the greater opportunity for all brands is bringing together all of their data to create a single source of truth that they own and can continually enrich.
‘Influencer deals are being paused’: As Facebook boycott begins in earnest, influencer marketing feels a sting
The latest move to pause influencer marketing comes as marketers are not only reconsidering where their ads appear and the kind of content they appear next to, but as they work to figure out how they can better support Black creators and Black-owned businesses following the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.
As Facebook boycott continues, here’s a look at what major marketers were spending on Facebook and Instagram
To get a sense of how much advertisers are pulling back from Facebook, Digiday reached out to ad-tracking firm Pathmatics. The company provided estimates for how much advertisers spent on the platform during July 2019 as well as from July 2019 to 2020.