Digiday Research: Marketers aren’t prioritizing the fight against ad fraud
A Digiday poll of 100 client-side marketing executives on their media-buying objectives found limiting their exposure to ad fraud as least important.
Using a weighted average for responses, where five equaled most important and one equaled the least importance, improving audience targeting came out on top with a score of 4.3, while restricting ad fraud stumbled in at 3.62. Issues around improving attribution measurement and avoiding unsafe brand environments came in between.
“It’s easier for marketers to deny, deny, deny,” said Keith Hernandez, CEO of Launch Angle,. “Some marketers are saying, ‘this might be an industry problem, but it’s not our problem.”
Some also argue that ad fraud is the fundamental issue for marketers giving the impact it has on areas like audience targeting or campaign measurement. ”
How good is audience targeting and how representative is attribution if a significant percentage of the “audience” are bots?” asked Israel Mirsky, Executive Director, Global Technology and Emerging Platforms, OMD Worldwide. Without fighting against ad fraud first, trying to fix other issues could be an effort in futility.
Rather than address the issue themselves, some marketers could still be relying on their agencies to keep them safe from fraudulent ads. Even as work like creating media strategies are increasingly done in-house, the execution and onus for evading ad fraud still reside with the agency.
“We’re are paying tens of millions if not hundreds of millions to agencies to do that due diligence for us. But really, should we?” said Hernandez. Given that the flawed auditing process by agencies and third-parties can fail to shed light on how much fraudulent inventory agencies buy, it is a fair question to ask.
“While ad fraud is universally decried, its true cost is buried in the media stack and daunting to unpack, while the economics of targeting is relatively straightforward,” said Daniel Jaye, CEO of customer-data-platform Aqfer.
‘We’re letting Facebook grade their own homework’: Here’s how advertisers’ desired changes differ from overall boycott
The overall goals of civil rights advocates organizing the boycott differ slightly from those of advertisers.
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.
Member Exclusive‘Are you going to put people over profit?’: As Facebook boycott continues, DTCs still running ads on the platform in a tricky spot
The Facebook boycott is part of a larger cultural shift towards a more “values-based consumerism.”
SponsoredWhy data clean rooms are a start, but not enough
Clean rooms are intended to be a “safe space” for brands to collaborate with walled gardens, but the greater opportunity for all brands is bringing together all of their data to create a single source of truth that they own and can continually enrich.
WTF is California’s new, and potentially stronger, privacy law?
In November, California residents will vote on the state's second privacy law, which is basically the CCPA 2.0
‘Influencer deals are being paused’: As Facebook boycott begins in earnest, influencer marketing feels a sting
The latest move to pause influencer marketing comes as marketers are not only reconsidering where their ads appear and the kind of content they appear next to, but as they work to figure out how they can better support Black creators and Black-owned businesses following the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.