The TV industry is gradually moving toward giving networks a longer window to monetize their DVR audiences. But inertia from legacy media companies, logistical issues related to billing and fed up advertisers prevent broadcasters from eliminating time caps set around how long they can charge advertisers for viewed ads after a show’s air date.
“If we allow TV networks to monetize DVR viewers after seven days without doing any improvement to their ad measurements, they will do that and continue saddling us with Nielsen indefinitely,” said an ad buyer requesting anonymity. “I would prefer to deny them the ability to do that so that they are forced to innovate.”
As long as DVRs have existed, there have been caps around how long TV networks can make money off viewers who watch shows after they air. Most deals give networks three to seven days to make money off their DVR viewers, and to an extent, this makes sense since many ads have a time peg. Labor Day promos don’t have much meaning in October, for instance.
But TV networks, who are getting hit hard by cord cutting, say that if an ad can be measured as being watched by a user, then they should get paid regardless of when the ad is viewed. Last year, Nielsen threw a bone to the networks and introduced a metric that incorporated DVR viewing up to 35 days after a show’s air date into its ratings.
Extending the cutoff time from seven days to 35 days boosted viewership across various networks by between 2 and 8 percent, according to a Nielsen study. While that increase might not sound like much, advertisers will spend $72 billion on TV in the U.S. this year, so small gains here can result in a lot of money changing hands.
Dave Morgan, CEO of TV ad-targeting firm Simulmedia, said that the TV industry is moving toward giving networks a longer window in which they can get credit for their DVR viewing. But unlike digital media, the TV industry moves at a slower pace when making changes.
“The TV ad business is all about bulk commodity pricing and negotiation, not really effectiveness and tracking,” he said. “Media buyers would argue that they already account for the delayed viewers when they negotiate pricing, just as they have done for decades.”
Howard Shimmel, chief research officer at Turner, also said the industry is moving toward giving broadcasters a longer window in which they can get credit for their DVR ads. For TNT, 18 percent of its viewership comes through DVR, so extending the cutoff from seven days to 35 days can have a noticeable impact on ad revenue.
But one of the challenges when incorporating a longer time frame into billing is accurately modeling how each additional day will incrementally increase overall ratings. Another issue with extending the DVR monetization window is that when an issue like underdelivery arises, advertisers will have to wait a full month before the issue can be reconciled, Morgan said.
One possible solution to these conundrums is for TV networks to make more content available through video on demand, where ads are dynamically inserted and there’s no expiration date for when the audience can be monetized. But properly implementing dynamic ad insertion in VOD is harder than it sounds due to competitive clauses in TV rights contracts, said Jon Steinlauf, president of ad sales and marketing for Scripps Networks Interactive.
For example, Toyota and Ford may stipulate that they can’t share the same ad pod or have ads shown during the same program. These complicated agreements are part of the reason why digital TV streams fail to fill all of their ad slots.
“The networks, agencies and measurement companies will need to adjust the contract structure, timelines for payment and delivery, and legal paperwork in order to accommodate this change,” said Dan Schiffman, co-founder of TV measurement firm TVision Insights. “While it seems simple in concept, there are technical and contractual changes that are required in an industry that is notoriously resistant to change.”
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: How TikTok took over VidCon in 2022
This week’s Future of TV Briefing recaps how TikTok -- and TikTok creators -- overtook VidCon, the digital video industry's annual gathering that took place last week in Anaheim, California.
‘It’s a love-hate relationship’: VidCon’s Gen Z attendees sound off on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, TV and streaming
More than a dozen VidCon attendees share how they feel about YouTube and TikTok, why Instagram seems to be fading (or at least aging) and which streaming services they prefer.
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: A Q&A with Vox Media Studios’ Chad Mumm
This week’s Future of TV Briefing features an interview with Vox Media Studios' chief creative officer Chad Mumm who talks about the media company's latest show and how the production business has evolved.
SponsoredWhy the caliber of content is paramount for advertisers
Agata Brodniewska, brand safety manager, Dailymotion Content is king when attracting consumers but is equally essential when courting advertisers. While both stakeholders want many of the same things, they most notably want relevant content they can count on to deliver an accurate and honest message without confusion or misinformation. This is especially important for advertisers […]
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: The next phase of the TV upfront market
This week’s Future of TV Briefing looks at the stage of the upfront cycle where advertisers submit their orders, which may not match up with the initially agreed-upon commitments.
Agency execs shine a light on connected TV advertising’s Goldilocks paradox during Digiday’s CTV virtual forum
The hybridization of TV and digital in CTV is complicated due to nuances introduced by that blend that, when not accounted for, can compromise CTV’s promise.