Washington Post eyes national scale for its events business

Jeff Bezos’ crusade to make The Washington Post relevant to more than just D.C. insiders is extending to the newspaper’s events business as well.

The newspaper announced on Thursday that it will be launching “America Answers,” a new events series that looks at how cities are solving big national issues on a local level. While The Washington Post Live, the newspaper’s event arm, has been putting on events since 2010, its latest series is the first to be designed as a template for further national and international events down the line.

“One of our goals here was to create a defining and original event series that has scalability across both verticals and geographical regions,” said Washington Post CRO Kevin Gentzel.”You can imagine us building on this with something like, for example, ‘India Answers’ or ‘Brazil Answers.'”

This “beyond the Beltway” thinking is a recent shift for The Washington Post, which has long focused the business side of the paper on the D.C. Metro area. But that’s very quickly changing. In March, it announced plans to give away its digital content to American metro newspapers like the Dallas Morning News and Minneapolis Star Tribune. Those regional papers are using the content to attract more local subscribers at the same time The Washington Post has been opening itself up to a much wider audience — albeit for free.

The Washington Posts’ outreach has extended internationally as well. It has recently started building out its first international office in London, with plans to expand elsewhere next year. The move made sense considering that The Washington Post already gets roughly 1.7 million monthly unique users from Europe without even focusing on the market.

But while The Washington Post wants to bring its events to a larger audience, success isn’t a given. Events are an increasingly common part of publishers’ business models these days, and the space risks becoming oversaturated. Thanks to the steady decline in advertising revenue online and print circulation offline, big publishers are being forced to think beyond banner ads and subscriptions in an effort to make a buck. The Washington Post and many other publishers are also, as a direct result, staffing up their own custom content studios to churn out content for brands.

And there’s evidence that the model can work: The Atlantic’s AtlanticLive events business, for example, has been so successful that it now accounts for nearly a fifth of the company’s overall revenue. (Digiday itself started as a conference series and still earns a percentage of its revenue through the events it hosts.) Similarly, BuzzFeed, which has never run banner ads, gets just about all of its revenue from running and producing sponsored content.

Gentzel said The Washington Post is also looking at ways to combine those two models. Brands might not only sponsor events but also video coverage of an event via BrandConnect, The Washington Post’s custom content product. “That drives a relevancy of branded content that would be very compelling to Web readers that are coming to consume the event content,” he said

Steve Goldberg, managing partner at Empirical Media, said that with The Washington Post’s brand and size, it has a shot at success. “When a newspaper picks out a topic and digs deep into with it with events, they open themselves up to a constant and high-margin revenue-stream potential,” he said. Even within a tightening Beltway.

https://digiday.com/?p=86986

More in Media

Media Briefing: How Dow Jones is developing an AI model to help its planning team respond to advertisers’ RFPs

This week’s Media Briefing looks at how Dow Jones is incorporating generative AI tools into its ad ops workflows.

Retail media strategies

Snap survey: How brands’ retail media strategies are maturing

That was the overarching theme at Digiday Media’s Retail Media Strategies event held in New York City last month.

Google ad tech antitrust trial

What happens in the Google ad tech antitrust trial now that testimony is done?

While some observers felt like there were no “bombshells” during the testimony, there was still a sense of vindication that some evidence has come to light.