
The Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post made an inadvertent move into commerce with a “buy it now” button appearing in an Aug. 15 article about a Charlie and the Chocolate Factory controversy.
Readers quickly concluded that since the Amazon founder bought the ailing paper a year ago, he has started using the paper to drive sales of products on the online retail juggernaut. The link was subsequently removed. Here’s what it looked like:
WashPo (owned by Bezos) inserting AMZN “Buy It Now” buttons into articles. Via @tealtan https://t.co/1SLZtMLlsp pic.twitter.com/ZUqGLgPwEJ
— Hunter Walk (@hunterwalk) August 17, 2014
A spokeswoman for the Post, however, said the paper has been embedding buy-it now links in articles “for many years” and that they haven’t been used more widely under Bezos. She said the buttons are added by the copy desk, so the writers and editors who worked on the story are not involved.
As for why the button no longer appeared in the Aug. 15 article, she explained that the in-article button functionality was a mistake. The button was dropped when the Post recently introduced a new article format, then unintentionally added back in a way that put the links into the text instead of on the side.
“It was not intentional,” she said. “And yes, the button is being fixed and will go back on the side where it has always been.”
Buy it now links remain in other reviews and even news articles and comments, as Pando pointed out, like in this Aug. 15 music book review and back to this January 2013 letter to the editor.
Other publishers, including Gawker and Hearst Magazines, have been inserting such buy-now links on their sites for years. The use of the tactic in the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory article was particularly creepy, though, because the article dealt with the controversy about the book’s new cover that featured a sexualized young girl, presumably one of the book’s characters.
In-line advertising has been around for years, too, with providers like Vibrant Media turning keyword links in articles into ads.
Newspaper publishers are pressured to find new sources of revenue, even if it’s just a tiny portion of affiliate revenue from sales, but the risk is in compromising editorial independence (or appearing to do so) and turning off readers in the process, as comments on this article showed.
If the buy-it now button is gone, the Post is still serving Amazon ads in the right rail for packaged goods with the tagline, “shop now.” (And, of course, those ubiquitous Google AdSense units.)
More in Media

As Patreon and Substack enter the mix, the livestreaming landscape is dividing creators
Platforms’ livestreaming push has highlighted an underlying divide in the community of livestreaming creators.

Digiday+ Research: Publishers were ready to depend more on first-party data. So, now what?
Publishers were ready for the move away from third-party data: the role of first-party data in generating ad revenue was set to grow significantly, and the percentage of ad impressions served by first-party data was set to increase.

Digiday+ Research Data Sheet: The state of subscription pricing
This infographic details how publishers are approaching subscription pricing and how subscriptions drive other revenue streams for publishers.