As part of an ongoing series, Digiday looks at things that are often put out as fact in the industry that, on closer inspection, don’t hold up. Earlier we explained why time spent online doesn’t correlate to budget spent.
According to a WSJ article published yesterday, AOL is asking up to $35 CPMs for inventory in its Huffington Post iPhone app. It’s a nice idea, but as most publishers are aware, few advertisers would even consider buying mobile ads at that price. Tablet ads might get some consideration, but not in-app mobile. Mobile-ad buyers agreed: $35 CPMs might be rate card, but nobody’s paying that in mobile, where supply far outstrips demand.
“I have not come across pricing that high for mobile-ad inventory,” said Phuc Truong, U.S. managing director of Havas-owned mobile agency Mobext. “Of the big portals, AOL is among the laggards to effectively monetize their mobile inventory. We rarely hear from their sales team about mobile opportunities.”
Dirk Rients, management director of mobile platforms at Draftfcb, expressed similar sentiments. “I’d be very surprised if any marketer would be willing to make an investment at that rate. … It really depends on the ad-unit type, but I haven’t seen anything even close to $35 CPM,” he said.
Of course, the $35 figure is a rate-card price, serving as a starting point for negotiations rather than a fixed price. One publisher described rate card as serving the same role as manufacturers’ suggested retail price on cars, i.e., a price nobody really pays. An AOL spokesperson said mobile ads are charged at a range of prices across its properties and that $35 is not necessarily the standard. Even so, few publishers are asking for investment at that level when they know it’s a buyer’s market.
“We’ll probably see a similar situation with AOL and HuffPo as we did will Apple’s iAd. … Start high, realize nobody is willing to pay, and then they’ll loosen their terms and drop the price,” Rients suggested.
-
Marketers weigh the cons of working with Google Ad Manager amid Justice Department’s new lawsuit
When is it time to back away?
-
Atlas Obscura wants to be profitable before raising funds in a tricky media market
Atlas Obscura wants to turn a profit this year before it raises another funding round, at a time when publishers are facing lower valuations and pickier investors as deal activity slows.
-
Publishers report Q1 ad revenue is pacing 10-25% behind forecasts
Publishers are facing a slow start to Q1 and sales teams have a lot of work to do to regain lost time.
-
SponsoredHow ad tech is tackling waste by optimizing supply chains
Sponsored by Bidtellect The programmatic and digital advertising industry is well aware of the inefficiencies in buying and selling — from auction duplication and volume bias to multi-integrations and reselling — but how did it get this out of control? How can we fix it? A redundant, multiple-step process to ad delivery has become the norm, […]
-
WTF is cookie stuffing?
Fraud is a well-documented pox on digital advertising, but it’s also an issue for publishers and marketers working together on affiliate marketing deals, too. One of the more tried-and-true techniques is cookie stuffing.
-
Bloomberg, Axios, Politico, other business publishers rethink subscriber retention during the economic downturn
Premium publishers, like POLITICO, Axios and Bloomberg, have to make sure their fees are still considered a necessity as readers recalculate their spending and companies recalculate their expense budgets.
