Truth is a tricky thing in the media industry.
Whether it’s what publishers say to agencies and brands to get their money or what agencies say to themselves about their position in the chain, half-truths and obfuscations are the norm.
And yet like most industries there’s an unwritten code of conduct about what’s OK and what’s not. It’s expected for an account manager to lie to the creative team about why the client rejected their work. Nobody believes rate cards. Agencies routinely, well, stretch the truth about their capabilities and who will work on an account during the pitch process. There are taboos, however. It’s not all right for an agency to lie on time sheets for clients. At least not when the client is the government — ask the Ogilvy execs who went to jail for that.
“It’s not necessarily a situation where people aren’t telling truth, but instead presenting themselves in the best way possible,” said Annie Heckenberger, community trailblazer at Red Tettemer + Partners. “It’s just like online dating: put up best photo, best lighting, best smile, but it’s still them.”
A publisher’s sales force also builds up a reservoir of untruths when it sells. Of course, the spin on that is that a salesperson is trying to put its outlet in the best possible light. This isn’t exactly new. It’s sales after all. For example, in the days of print media, publishers would embellish circulation numbers with beyond-belief “passalong.” Now, it’s around audience metrics.
“They’re quoted everywhere, but neither agencies, nor their clients, nor the publishers themselves really believe those numbers,” said Jason Pontin, editor-in-chief and publisher of MIT Technology Review.
Then there are publishers that simply game the system. The Web world is full of tricks to goose pageviews, which continue to be the coin of the digital realm. That can mean anything from hyper-aggressive aggregation of others’ work, practicing the dark arts of SEO or employing the ever popular mullet strategy — business in the front (serious articles for a highly valuable demographic) and party in the back (eye-candy posts to draw traffic).
On the agency side, half-truths run rampant; it’s endemic of the culture. Agencies are in a hyper-competitive services business. That means doing pretty much anything to win accounts, even if it means stretching the truth on what the agency can really do. After all, there are plenty of agencies out there “faking it till they make it” in digital.
“I love it when a client calls them on it,” said an agency exec. “A lot of it isn’t looking at what are we here for — to sell the product — instead, in most cases, it’s to sell ourselves.”
And within agencies, there are half-truths. Sure, creatives are about driving a client’s business forward, but in reality they’re often more about driving their careers forward. That means awards, which are gotten from big sexy creative efforts, not necessarily achieving business goals.
“Sometimes the not sexy thing is the right thing to do,” said one former agency exec. “We give too much credit to the shine, and not enough to the pragmatists.”
When the creative isn’t very good, that’s when the lying really kicks in. With creatives known for their sensitivity, account execs are forced to come up with alternative reasons for why the client rejected their work.
“You’re not allowed to say [a creative’s] work is crap,” one agency exec said. “I’ve seen where we have presented on a pitch where no one thought the work we presented was very good, but no one would tell the person the work sucked. I couldn’t believe that. Where else does that happen? You have to be careful of the creative’s feeling?”
Brands aren’t innocent in this, either. The brand exec told me that “messages [and the supporting creative] are developed to please executives and everyone knows it. They are not created based on data or customer needs.” Many campaigns are made at the whim of a top executive.
Of course, the problem here is that every brand wants something never been done before. “I need big ideas, but here’s the KPIs against that, and it has to be insane!” one publisher told me. “How can you put KPIs against something that’s never been done before? Will someone give you $5 million for KPIs that will never happen? Therein lies the catch-22.”
For all these selective representations or persuasive interpretations from brands, agencies and publishers, they’re all like Honest Abe Lincoln compared to ad tech vendors, whom everyone believes are just a bunch of lying liars.
Image via Shutterstock.com
Publishers say the competition is steeper than expected for event sponsorship dollars this year
Selling events was harder than expected for some publishers in Q2, but having a niche helped win some of the coveted sponsorship dollars.
Why some publishers are giving their AI chatbots a personality
BuzzFeed and Ingenio are hoping giving their chatbots a unique voice and tone will differentiate their AI products but others are prioritizing utility over entertainment.
Digiday+ Research: Nearly two-thirds of publishers think they will lose when the third-party cookie dies
Publishers have been busy prepping for the end of the third-party cookie, but that doesn't mean they think they'll come out on top in the post-cookie era. In fact, publishers count themselves among those who stand to lose from the end of the cookie.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
Media Briefing: Publisher execs fear lack of visibility for Q3, but feel steady year over year
Publisher execs share how Q2 shook out for their businesses as they brace for an equally murky second half.
Spotify cancels six true crime podcasts amid layoffs, Gimlet-Parcast merger
Spotify is canceling six shows and laying off 200 people as it merges its Gimlet and Parcast units to push its podcast business towards profitability.