Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25
There was a time when Madison Avenue was obsessed with the threat from Google. The idea was Google, with its near limitless financial resources and engineering might, was hell-bent on automating the ad industry and cutting out agencies in the process. That didn’t happen. Now it’s Facebook’s turn to feel the concerns. Ian Schafer, CEO of Deep Focus, has a piece up on Harvard Business Review that makes a credible case for why Facebook is moving in a direction that will irrevocably change with media-buying agencies do. Media agencies tend to buy commoditized “nouns” (impressions, clicks, etc.) while Facebook wants to move to sell “verbs” (likes, shares, etc.) Like the Google threat, this one probably won’t materialize to much. Facebook needs agencies to convert its enormous attention into a similarly large media business. There will be room for media agencies to tap into Facebook’s enormous trove of data to do impression-and click-based buying, as Schafer himself notes. Read the full post here.
More in Media
Layoffs hit LADbible Group’s social video team amid slower user-generated content growth
Social-first publisher LADbible is in the middle of a second round of layoffs to its social video team, having suffered massive drop-off in Facebook video engagement.
AI surfacing is messy: Data shows publisher visibility and traffic often misalign
Reports tracking publishers in AI chatbots abound but conflicting rankings and uneven referral traffic reveal the murkiness of AI visibility.
GEO hype busted: How it differs (and how it doesn’t) from SEO
GEO is flooding media execs’ inboxes. But SEO veterans say these AI visibility services may not be as revolutionary as they seem.