Salon Soldiers On

The dot-com crash wasn’t kind. In 2001, it shifted to a paywall model, hedging against a receding online ad market. By 2002, Salon was delisted from Nasdaq. For the last decade, Salon has experimented with various models, paring down expenses and “revamping staff priorities so that writers could simply produce more,” wrote editor-in-chief, Kerry Lauerman in a February blog post.

It retrenched, slashing staff and groping for a workable business model at a time when online advertising struggled. The early embrace of a paywall might have saved Salon, according to Lauerman. Salon charged $30-$35 per subscription, surpassing 100,000 subscribers by 2004.

“It was an enormous pain back then to create a new revenue stream when online advertising disappeared overnight,” Lauerman said.

It came at a cost. Salon sacrificed its role as, well, a salon open to everyone. It was mostly absent from the back-and-forth of the Web, particularly with the explosion of digital media. Subsequent metering models have found a better balancing act to Salon’s blunt force approach, but it has moved back to an all-advertising model.

“That’s the ugly part of being the pioneer: we had to try out these things because no one had done it before us,” said Lauerman. “Now people can look at the NYT and see what they did.”

A decade later, Salon is still trying to find its footing. While still respected for its commentary —Alex Pareene’s Hack List has become an industry must-read — it isn’t exactly a juggernaut. ComScore pegs its monthly traffic at 2.7 million uniques in June 2012, down 10 percent from a year earlier. At that size, with its focus on culture and lefty politics, Salon isn’t going to warrant much attention from ad buyers. In fact, ad revenue for its last fiscal year came in at $3 million, down $500,000 from the previous year. Despite its early embrace of subscriptions, Salon is more ad dependent than ever, with 79 percent of its revenue from advertising. It recently shuttered online community site TheWell.com, which charged $150 per year.

Compare that experience with The Atlantic, a legacy media brand that initially struggled online. The Atlantic has since fully embraced the Web with well-read blogs and a snappy site. The vanguard publication drew 3.6 million uniques in April, and according Scott Havens, svp of digital and finance for The Atlantic, 40 percent of referral traffic comes from social media. In other words, The Atlantic is proving you can teach an old dog new tricks.

Salon is now left to rebuild. It recently scrapped its legacy content-management system that dated back over a decade in favor of WordPress. On the management side, in June it elevated Cindy Jeffers from CTO to CEO. She led the creation of the HuffingtonPost.com and helped build its CMS prior to joining Salon in May.

“The key to our future is that collaboration and the media innovation out of those collaborations,” Jeffers said. “What I’m hoping is that we become a tech leader, where we build and experiment on new platforms — social and points of data and new ways of interacting with stories.”

Salon has tacked away from the current vogue for aggregation and “listicles” of the Buzzfeed variety. Instead, it has returned to its roots of thoughtful, original content.

“The quality [to] quantity ratio has to be right,” Lauerman said. “Readers are coming to us for definitive takes and smart reporting. When we sacrificed that, by speeding up by doing more quick posts, the payoff was negligible.”

Jeffers says the company is refocusing on direct ad sales. In April, Salon brought in Matt Sussberg from Wenner Media as vp of sales to develop integrated interactive approaches. There is vague talk of “innovative products” rolling out in the months ahead.

“One of my main goals is to make us a news innovator and a leader in that space,” Jeffers said.