The end goal, after the tech details are hashed out, is to bring needed efficiency to the ad-bidding world — and allow the many small players to compete without having one standard imposed from above. That one standard from above, of course, would be via Google. The digital ad system is developing into two camps: Google and everyone else. Google is working to build an end-to-end system, one that is often painted by competitors as “closed.” (Think Apple’s approach with iOS.) Others, including the proposed Microsoft-Yahoo-AOL alliance, are banking on an open approach.
The IAB’s head, Randall Rothenberg, announced the support for the standard yesterday at an OpenRTB Town Hall. (I moderated the discussion.) Participants in the meeting wasted little time criticizing Google for holding back support for the standard. Google group product manager Scott Spencer asserted Google does favor open standards, only it wants the best protocol used. He also noted the meeting was the first time Google was invited.
The skirmishes are part of a bigger game of positioning how the emerging ad-tech landscape will shake out. Another interesting non-supporter of the standard: AppNexus, which is emerging as a force on the bidding landscape. It was a member of the OpenRTB group but then dropped out.
More in Media
Future plc CFO stepping down as company reports revenue declines and new two-year investment plan
Future plc’s CFO Penny Ladkin-Brand announced on Thursday that she is stepping down, as the U.K.- based media company reported declining revenues and a new two-year investment plan to get back to growth.
Media Briefing: Publishers’ AI task forces evolve into a more distributed model of experimentation
In this week’s Media Briefing, publishing executives share how the task forces they created earlier this year to oversee generative AI guidelines and initiatives have expanded to include more people across their organizations.
News publishers hesitate to commit to investing more into Threads next year despite growing engagement
News publishers are cautious to pour more resources into Threads, as limited available data makes it difficult to determine whether investing more into the platform is worth it.