In a recent Atlantic Monthly article on the impact of digital media, there’s a simple graph that sums up the issue: $40 billion evaporated with little likelihood of return.
Rather than waste more time pointing fingers, publishers need to get on with figuring out what’s next. For many years, the news industry was dependent on classifieds because they owned the exclusive distribution of information in their geographies. Consumers were never really paying for the “paper” but, instead, for access to their daily information whether it was news, local, business, etc. Right now Google and Facebook own that distribution, and this market dynamic continues to move so quickly that its last owner, Yahoo, has already faltered into a lesser tier.
The solution for publishers is simple: Publishers need to exclusively own the distribution and the majority of it. Create exclusive channels from the delivery of it which also translates into how to service the marketing community. Publishers should understand how consumers are receiving the information you’re distributing and explore means of owning business relationships with these distribution companies that go far beyond organic search, paid search, tweets, etc. That means creating exclusive pipes. That’s where the investment is going to continue. A marketplace where buyers have multiple channels to reach the same audience only leads to a race to the bottom and commoditization of access.
On the content side, publishers need to pick something to own and give every available resource possible to owning it. If your niche is small business, lifestyle, or general local news content, own it and own the access to it. Make it become an interactive channel that you own. Consumers will respond by loyalty, which marketers will respond by direct investment. Just check out Google’s and Facebook’s financials.
All of these are easier said than done. But if there is going to a reassertion of media brands, these brands have to make their brands useful to consumers interactively. It’s not enough to merely leverage an old media model online. After all, media spending will continue to go to those who own and aggregate distribution and the 90 cents that’s evaporated from print dollars to digital dimes will be owned and secured by the companies that deliver that access to consumers, not the media brands who provide it to the aggregators.
Mario Diez is CEO of QuadrantOne, a local audience targeting platform.
Publishers speak out on the state of the media business at the Digiday Publishing Summit
With the calendar flipping to spring, do publishers feel like the economic conditions are starting to thaw or do they expect the second quarter to be similarly frigid?
How Forbes and The Daily Beast are consolidating diverse revenue streams to create the highest value audience
Forbes and The Daily Beast have shed the silo-model when it comes to how their revenue teams operate.
How BuzzFeed’s Creator Score is grading the impact of its creator network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network is a primary focus in 2023 for the publisher, and its campaign grading tool is being used to prove out its ability to create successful ads.
SponsoredHow critical data pillars will increase brands’ confidence in CTV
Mario Diez, CEO, Peer39 With every quarter, the balance of TV viewership slips away from the traditional linear model and more towards connected TV. Less than half of the adults in the U.S. subscribe to cable or satellite, and fewer than half of the households watched linear TV daily in the second half of 2022. […]
In graphic detail: Google’s Ads Safety Report shows suspect ad activities are on the rise
Google's ad transparency efforts detail how bad actors necessitate further investment.
Media Briefing: Publishers share their biggest challenges and opportunities at the Digiday Publishing Summit
While Q1 ad revenue, sales cycles and payment windows appeared to be equally bad across the media industry, bright spots arose around consumer revenue streams, new tech experimentation and traffic patterns.