The New York Times’ Innovation report was meant for Times employees alone, but since a handful of media outlets published the leaked document last week, it has reverberated throughout the news and business sides of the publishing industry — and resonated with those who see their own organizations face the same struggle to adapt to the digital age. Here’s a sampling of (anonymous) reactions:
“You never know how dysfunctional a place is. It’s the wild west, even for The New York Times. On the one hand, I’m sure there’s some collective schadenfreude. On the other hand, at least they’re experimenting.” — Magazine editor-in-chief
“An extremely useful document. We should thank the New York Times for doing months of expensive work for the rest of us! Most of us are ahead in some areas and behind in others.” — Magazine editor
“I don’t think it has much however to do with how big or small the operation is. Meaningful change is developed over time and the pain points are to be expected. The only other path that can lead to quicker change is what Time Inc. is proposing by aggregating the content of others and packaging it as your own innovation. But the market sees it as a shortcut that lacks the authority and credible voice of the original brand.” — Newspaper sales executive
“None of it is surprising. It’s painfully obvious. If you’re in the trenches, it’s less shocking than if you’re not. It all resonated. The conversation about being behind in tagging and structured data practices … everybody’s trying to figure out structured data.” — Magazine digital exec
“I’ve faced the same issues, but with inferior brands, and lost the fight. Their brand is unique, though. So the good news is that if they do the work, and keep hiring digital-first thinkers, the next generation will trust and value the New York Times. And by the way, if war broke out or a disaster hit a place where I had family or friends, I’m not sure I’d be interested in news feed content from a disruptive but thinly staffed news publisher, whose only concern is getting it first.” — Digital sales exec
Publishers speak out on the state of the media business at the Digiday Publishing Summit
With the calendar flipping to spring, do publishers feel like the economic conditions are starting to thaw or do they expect the second quarter to be similarly frigid?
How Forbes and The Daily Beast are consolidating diverse revenue streams to create the highest value audience
Forbes and The Daily Beast have shed the silo-model when it comes to how their revenue teams operate.
How BuzzFeed’s Creator Score is grading the impact of its creator network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network is a primary focus in 2023 for the publisher, and its campaign grading tool is being used to prove out its ability to create successful ads.
SponsoredHow critical data pillars will increase brands’ confidence in CTV
Mario Diez, CEO, Peer39 With every quarter, the balance of TV viewership slips away from the traditional linear model and more towards connected TV. Less than half of the adults in the U.S. subscribe to cable or satellite, and fewer than half of the households watched linear TV daily in the second half of 2022. […]
In graphic detail: Google’s Ads Safety Report shows suspect ad activities are on the rise
Google's ad transparency efforts detail how bad actors necessitate further investment.
Media Briefing: Publishers share their biggest challenges and opportunities at the Digiday Publishing Summit
While Q1 ad revenue, sales cycles and payment windows appeared to be equally bad across the media industry, bright spots arose around consumer revenue streams, new tech experimentation and traffic patterns.