New York tabloids shock Internet with ‘horrible’ covers showing WDBJ news crew murder

Horrible. Despicable. Tasteless.

Those are just some of the adjectives being used on social media describing the New York Daily News and New York Post front pages this morning showing the final moments of Alison Parker’s life, the Virginia reporter who was shot dead on live television Wednesday.

Both tabloids plastered still images from a video recorded by the gunman — a different video than the one recorded on live television during the interview. (The live video was itself the trigger of a different kind of outrage at Facebook and Twitter because it automatically started playing in people’s feeds yesterday, much to their horror.)

The Daily News used three stills with one of them showing Parker screaming seconds before she was murdered with the headline screaming “Executed on live TV.”

Reaction ranged from shock to disgust after the Daily news posted a tweet with the cover:

“Zero respect for the families involved,” tweeted another. “Not even sure the Post would do this.”

Which, it turned out, isn’t entirely true. Its front page also featured a frame from the shooter’s video, albeit only slightly less graphic than the Daily News’.

“Another disgusting, disrespectful newspaper,” one person tweeted, while another called the Post “trash.”  Compared to the New York tabloids, newspapers in Richmond were a sharp contrast showing instead the victims in happier times or the community unite to mourn.

Shown below are the covers of the Roanoke Times and the Richmond Times-Dispatch:

“Please take note,” a Twitter used wrote tagging the Daily News, “[This is a] proper way to do a cover.”

More in Media

Brands turn to creators to build World Cup buzz amid a logistics nightmare

A US-based World Cup poses unique problems and opportunities for brands; activating creators away from the games may be the solution.

Reuters and Time adopt bot-blocking whitelists to rein in AI crawlers

Reuters and Time adopt a ‘block-all’ AI bot strategy, part of a broader publisher move toward whitelist-only access.

Google’s AI opt-out leaves publishers with a choice they can’t safely use

The CMA has, on paper, given publishers a right to refuse AI in search. But because it’s opt-out, and Google is slow-walking the data needed to judge the impact, that right is barely usable, publishers say.