It’s often publishers that are left claiming that the influx of venture capital-backed advertising technology companies is leading to a downward spiral of low-priced, low-quality ads that make it nearly impossible to be a content publisher. Now you can count at least one top VC as also in that camp: Marc Andreessen.
Earlier today and this evening, Andreesen engaged in a lively Twitter discussion on the fate of news as a business, taking a few detours to address the ills of Web advertising. After he complained about teeth whitening ads, I posed the question to him whether advertising technology had failed publishers, seeing as the ads he complained about weren’t direct sold but placed through the Web of intermediaries that’s arisen to comprise the ad system.
That’s fairly damning coming from the founder of Netscape and the leader of one of the top VC firms, Andreessen Horowitz. Andreessen, whose firm invests in tech platforms rather than media, had several other interesting thoughts on the state of news businesses and advertising.
The news market will expand.
Picking up from Part 1: Best news about news business is gigantic expansion of addressable market — rise of developing world + Internet. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Total addressable market for news by 2020: ~5 billion people worldwide; straight extrapolate from # of cell phones -> smartphones globally.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Alas, that’s not great for many incumbents.
Many evolving markets seeing “death of middle”: broadest breadth winning; deepest depth winning; neither broadest nor deepest in trouble.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And scale will matter — or expertise in an area.
So logical to expect big winners in news business to either be the broadest or the deepest: to max mass or go max specific.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Of the eight possible ways he sees to build a business off news, ads will remain No. 1.
(1) Advertising. Still central for many news businesses. But need to get out of “race to bottom” of bad content, bad advertisers, bad ads. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Publishers need more self-respect
Quality journalism businesses need to either take responsibility for own high-quality advertisers & ads, or work with partners who do. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
The banner ad has failed publishers and the industry.
@zachcoelius Yes. Internet advertising suffering horribly by premature format standardization. Has been rolling fiasco for 2 decades. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Because the ads are really terrible.
There is no excuse for crappy network-served teeth whitening and “one weird trick” ads served against high quality content. Disastrous.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And irrelevant.
@jeffjarvis Right. Vast majority of ads I’ve seen in my life has been irrelevant to me. Continues every day. Mass waste. Makes no sense. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Subscriptions will play a role.
(2) Subscriptions. Many consumers pay $ for things they value much of the time. If they’re unwilling to pay, ask Q, are they really valuing? — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
(3) Premium content. Paid tier on top of free ad-supported. High end e.g.: Bloomberg & Reuters. Will work for more & more. Again, value = $. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And so will other avenues, like events.
(4) Conferences & events. Bits becoming abundant; human presence becoming scarce. Charge for scarcity. Bits drive demand for presence. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Quality is still a viable strategy in a world of aggregation and clickbait.
On Internet, no limitation to # of outlets, voices; therefore quality can easily coexist with crap. All can thrive in respective markets.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
In fact, the amount of noise increases the value of the signal.
And, the more noise, confusion, and crap — corresponding increase in need for trusted guides, respected experts, quality brands.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And that will lead to a diversity of media companies, even if they’re not enormous businesses.
Remember: Most great businesses are not big businesses. This market plenty big enough for thousands of high-margin small-medium businesses.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Image via Shutterstock
-
‘Not the future’: European publishers remain steadfast in blocking alternative IDs to third-party cookies
Some European publishers believe alternatives to the third-party cookies, probabilistic or deterministic, will do more harm than good to their ads businesses.
-
Media Briefing: Why Leaf Group spun off its media arm into a standalone company
World of Good's newly appointed CEO Lindsey Abramo spoke with Digiday about her plans to lean into experiential and embrace niche vs. scale.
-
Dentsu’s latest ad report shows slowed growth, driven mostly by inflation
The good news in Dentsu's ad forecast is that there's still growth. The bad news: most of the growth is the result of inflation, while real ad pricing actually dropped a bit.
-
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
-
How chef influencer Tue Nguyen works with the BuzzFeed Creator Network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network has been valuable from an audience and production education standpoint, but Nguyen still drives most of her business on her own.
-
Dentsu’s new Web3 readiness tool shines light on the tech’s potential to complement AI
Dentsu's Innovation Initiative is launching a web3 readiness index next month — at a time when the industry is obsessed with AI. Could the two technologies actually make a good pair?
