It’s often publishers that are left claiming that the influx of venture capital-backed advertising technology companies is leading to a downward spiral of low-priced, low-quality ads that make it nearly impossible to be a content publisher. Now you can count at least one top VC as also in that camp: Marc Andreessen.
Earlier today and this evening, Andreesen engaged in a lively Twitter discussion on the fate of news as a business, taking a few detours to address the ills of Web advertising. After he complained about teeth whitening ads, I posed the question to him whether advertising technology had failed publishers, seeing as the ads he complained about weren’t direct sold but placed through the Web of intermediaries that’s arisen to comprise the ad system.
That’s fairly damning coming from the founder of Netscape and the leader of one of the top VC firms, Andreessen Horowitz. Andreessen, whose firm invests in tech platforms rather than media, had several other interesting thoughts on the state of news businesses and advertising.
The news market will expand.
Picking up from Part 1: Best news about news business is gigantic expansion of addressable market — rise of developing world + Internet. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Total addressable market for news by 2020: ~5 billion people worldwide; straight extrapolate from # of cell phones -> smartphones globally.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Alas, that’s not great for many incumbents.
Many evolving markets seeing “death of middle”: broadest breadth winning; deepest depth winning; neither broadest nor deepest in trouble.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And scale will matter — or expertise in an area.
So logical to expect big winners in news business to either be the broadest or the deepest: to max mass or go max specific.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Of the eight possible ways he sees to build a business off news, ads will remain No. 1.
(1) Advertising. Still central for many news businesses. But need to get out of “race to bottom” of bad content, bad advertisers, bad ads. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Publishers need more self-respect
Quality journalism businesses need to either take responsibility for own high-quality advertisers & ads, or work with partners who do. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
The banner ad has failed publishers and the industry.
@zachcoelius Yes. Internet advertising suffering horribly by premature format standardization. Has been rolling fiasco for 2 decades. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Because the ads are really terrible.
There is no excuse for crappy network-served teeth whitening and “one weird trick” ads served against high quality content. Disastrous.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And irrelevant.
@jeffjarvis Right. Vast majority of ads I’ve seen in my life has been irrelevant to me. Continues every day. Mass waste. Makes no sense. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Subscriptions will play a role.
(2) Subscriptions. Many consumers pay $ for things they value much of the time. If they’re unwilling to pay, ask Q, are they really valuing? — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
(3) Premium content. Paid tier on top of free ad-supported. High end e.g.: Bloomberg & Reuters. Will work for more & more. Again, value = $. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And so will other avenues, like events.
(4) Conferences & events. Bits becoming abundant; human presence becoming scarce. Charge for scarcity. Bits drive demand for presence. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Quality is still a viable strategy in a world of aggregation and clickbait.
On Internet, no limitation to # of outlets, voices; therefore quality can easily coexist with crap. All can thrive in respective markets.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
In fact, the amount of noise increases the value of the signal.
And, the more noise, confusion, and crap — corresponding increase in need for trusted guides, respected experts, quality brands.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
And that will lead to a diversity of media companies, even if they’re not enormous businesses.
Remember: Most great businesses are not big businesses. This market plenty big enough for thousands of high-margin small-medium businesses.
— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) February 6, 2014
Image via Shutterstock
More in Media
News publishers hesitate to commit to investing more into Threads next year despite growing engagement
News publishers are cautious to pour more resources into Threads, as limited available data makes it difficult to determine whether investing more into the platform is worth it.
WTF is Google’s Protected Audience?
FLEDGE stands for ‘First Locally-Executed Decision over Groups Experiment’ and makes ad auction decisions in the browser, rather than at ad server level.
Digiday’s History of Ad Tech: In the beginning …
A look at the genesis of ad tech, from the first online display ad in 1994 to the dotcom crash.