Kevin Skobac is vp of digital and social strategy at SS+K, a marketing and communications agency. Follow him @kskobac.
It’s tempting to say we should have seen this coming, once the ink dried on Facebook’s $1 billion check.
Instagram’s recent terms of service change is straight out of Facebook’s playbook: Push too far on privacy, get slapped back to reality. Lose a little more face and trust from your community but minimal, if any, loss in users. Facebook was never going to sell our photos; that would have been business suicide.
But the writing is on the wall: Every misstep is leading to a larger outcry. We’re witnessing a death by a thousand cuts of the purely free, advertising supported social platform.
Instagram taught us free apps could be magic. With one touch, anyone can be an amazing photographer. A combination of filters, simple sharing and a passionate community helped Instagram skyrocket to Internet fame. The first two benefits are replaceable, as just this week, Flickr and Twitter rolled out copycat products. What’s left is community, and Instagram’s community is what Facebook paid for.
But communities are transient; they can’t be taken for granted.
And people are reconsidering whether this model is worth the disappointment and haphazard respect for their privacy, for an unpredictable product.
More and more, people are asking to pay to access and consume on their own terms of service, instead of “We gave you this for free, you are the product, deal with it.”
Dalton Caldwell’s ambitious App.net could be just the beginning. Even Flickr is starting to look pretty attractive again with a shiny new iPhone app and paid plan that ensures rights for users, not advertisers.
This was a seminal year for Instagram, from its billion dollar sale to Facebook to the first-ever Presidential re-election advertising campaign to run on the platform, #ForAll. But yesterday, the platform’s community of 100 million shouted a harbinger of things to come: What the community giveth, it can taketh away.
Social communities have power, they can effect change, and if they can help elect a president, they can certainly crumble irresponsible social networks and an abusive ad-supported model.
-
Green shoots: Publishers see ad activity return in China
Publishers are starting to see activity emerge from China and Northeast Asia.
-
‘A function of confidence’: Uncertainty casts a shadow over M&A deals
Dealmaking has been rife in the media and ad sectors in recent years as the market consolidated around fewer, more powerful players. But as the coronavirus hit, many companies have pulled the brakes on their acquisition plans. Save for one or two processes that were due to complete soon anyway, the majority of investment bank […]
-
How food publishers are giving back to the restaurant industry
While producing additional coverage may be the obvious approach for serving their communities in a time of need, Food & Wine, Eater and Thrillist have taken it a step further by setting up fundraising features and promoting local businesses.
-
SponsoredPublishers are experimenting with more engagement models
A growing number of publishers are using registration walls, paywalls and metered models to collect first-party user data and drive subscription revenue.
-
Bustle Digital Group, G/O Media cut staff
Bustle Digital Group announced the layoffs of a dozen staffers on Friday, including the entirety of The Outline’s staff, and pay cuts for some remaining employees.
-
‘Companies are in freeze mode’: Coronavirus crisis strains ad tech licensing model
Like so many other industries, the coronavirus crisis is rapidly separating the distance between the haves and the have nots in the software-as-a-service sector. In ad tech in particular, there was a rush in the middle of the last decade for companies to switch their models from charging clients a percentage of the media they […]
