‘Freakonomics’ author: new media isn’t so different from old
The more the Web changes media, the more media stays the same. If we’ve already lost you, maybe Stephen Dubner can clarify a few things.
After all, if anyone can provide first-hand knowledge as to how technology changes media, it’s Dubner, a musician and journalist whose work has been in a series industries upended by the Web. And yet, Dubner thinks the Web has had a minimal effect on how he creates media.
His first book, with co-author Steven Levitt, was informed by these experiences — and turned Dubner into a bestselling author (and, subsequently, pioneer in the burgeoning podcast industry). “Freakonomics,” published in 2005, was a unique blend of data and storytelling that to date has sold more than 4 million copies in dozens of languages. Dubner and Levitt followed it with “Superfreakonomics” in 2009, and their third installment, “Think Like a Freak,” will be published May 13.
Dubner recently chatted with Digiday about why new media isn’t so different from old after all. Excerpts:
How has digital changed how you promote the Freakonomics brand?
Economist Robert Gordon got a lot of attention for arguing that the digital revolution has been mind-blowing in some ways, but in terms of actually changing the thrust and shape of our economy, it’s been kind of “meh.” As fun as it can be, it is mostly a refinement on stuff we already had. I think the same way about media in the digital age. The kind of stories that resonate have not changed very much. That said, the means of amplifying stories has changed a lot, and almost entirely for the better. The great irony is that the digital age was going to kill reading and writing, when in fact everyone is now a writer.
That’s the exact kind of counterintuitive thinking I’d expect from a “Freakonomics” author.
[Laughs.] The truly weirdest thing — aside from the fact that people still buy and read books — is that the podcast is only possible because of the digital revolution. Apple and a few others built this free distribution architecture that allows me to publish anything I want to virtually anyone in the world who has any kind of device. Would I have even thought about starting a podcast if I had to build my own distribution channel? No way. So the free-riding that goes on in this space is enormous, and I’m a huge free rider.
Podcasting is interesting because it seems both fringe and popular.
It’s basically a huge niche. People making and consuming it think, “Why isn’t everyone swimming in this pool?” It’s efficient, there’s massive choice, it’s free for the most part. Then there’s the other 95 percent of the world that’s like, “What’s a podcast?” Once it becomes as easy to find a podcast as it is to find a radio dial in your car, I think that’s the point at which radio and podcasting becomes almost indistinguishable.
That mirrors the “depth over breadth” strategy some media companies are taking.
It’s an unbelievably interesting period with The Upshot, 538 and Vox. They represent a big change from the media landscape, but not really. It’s talented people who outgrew the place where they grew up, and they’re going to do their thing. If they succeed, it doesn’t mean the model is the success format. It might mean those people were going to succeed anywhere.
Those sites and others appear to have adopted a data-based approach to stories similar to yours.
I think our books helped make data-driven storytelling more palatable, but things were moving in that direction already. A lot of the people doing something similar now probably would’ve gotten there anyway.
You sound more excited about new media than some people who have been it as long as you have.
A market affords people who want stuff a way to get it. We’re living in this time where if you make or consume media, the riches are almost boundless. There will be winners and losers, people who complain, people who celebrate it, but that’s what a market is. It seems to be substantially better than other ones we’ve tried. I know a lot of people who no longer work in media who wish they did and that’s a drag, but I also know people who work in media who never thought they would, and that’s great.
Publishers say the competition is steeper than expected for event sponsorship dollars this year
Selling events was harder than expected for some publishers in Q2, but having a niche helped win some of the coveted sponsorship dollars.
Why some publishers are giving their AI chatbots a personality
BuzzFeed and Ingenio are hoping giving their chatbots a unique voice and tone will differentiate their AI products but others are prioritizing utility over entertainment.
Digiday+ Research: Nearly two-thirds of publishers think they will lose when the third-party cookie dies
Publishers have been busy prepping for the end of the third-party cookie, but that doesn't mean they think they'll come out on top in the post-cookie era. In fact, publishers count themselves among those who stand to lose from the end of the cookie.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
Media Briefing: Publisher execs fear lack of visibility for Q3, but feel steady year over year
Publisher execs share how Q2 shook out for their businesses as they brace for an equally murky second half.
Spotify cancels six true crime podcasts amid layoffs, Gimlet-Parcast merger
Spotify is canceling six shows and laying off 200 people as it merges its Gimlet and Parcast units to push its podcast business towards profitability.