Connect with execs from The New York Times, TIME, Dotdash Meredith and many more
Facebook is dealing with doubts about whether it will live up to expectations. This is a normal part of the hype cycle most hot tech companies go through. But under it all, there appears a fundamental misunderstanding on the part of Silicon Valley and Wall Street. Facebook is not Google.
Google’s remarkable rise was, as Peter Hershberg points out, very under-appreciated. Google’s IPO opened many people’s eyes to the wonder of search advertising, a “beautiful system” in the words of ex-Yahoo CEO Terry Semel where ads were actually helpful, unobtrusive and incredibly effective. Dalton Caldwell rightly termed what Google accomplished as “alchemy”: It took search results pages that were nearly worthless to Yahoo and made them incredibly valuable. Google’s alchemy, aka AdWords, was done by adopting the Web’s original native ad format, sponsored listings, and marrying that to the most powerful piece of data the Web’s produced: the intent signal.
That is a once-in-a-generation business model. AdWords gushed money and funded God knows how many harebrained efforts from Knol to Lively to space exploration. But AdWords ended up teaching Silicon Valley the wrong lesson. It taught entrepreneurs and VCs that the ad business was a basic engineering problem that could be solved with an algorithm. In fact, the biggest section of advertising (brand building) doesn’t work that way at all. There is more art than science in brand advertising.
Facebook, to its credit, is trying to pioneer a new form of advertising based on social signals. These are not direct intent signals like Google had in search. It will always be harder to turn a social signal into ad dollars because Facebook is in the attention-bartering business, a messy market that requires relationships, hand-holding and all sorts of stuff Silicon Valley pretends doesn’t matter. On top of that, Facebook is betting on a native advertising format, sponsored stories, that is unproven and foreign to marketers. It will take time for Facebook to sort this out, if it does.
Until then, time to stop comparing Facebook to Google.
More in Media
Three publishers’ workforce diversity reports show DEI efforts remain sluggish
Overall, staff diversity at The New York Times, Hearst and Condé Nast has either marginally improved or stalled in 2024, according to their annual workforce diversity data this year.
Retail media meets publishing: News UK, Future and Ocado tap clean room tech for smarter data targeting
News UK, The Independent, Immediate Media and Future are teaming up with retail media network Ocado to test clean room-powered data matching.
From sidelines to spotlight: Esports events are putting creators center stage
Esports events’ embrace of content creators reflects advertisers’ changing priorities across both gaming and the wider culture. In the past, marketers viewed esports as one of the best ways to reach gamers. In 2025, brands are instead prioritizing creators in their outreach to audiences across demographics and interest areas, including gaming.