Bon Appétit’s readers like their tomatoes room-temperature and their editorial pure.
The Condé Nast glossy is usually tantalizing readers with mouth-watering recipes. But this month it had readers gagging when it covered its August issue with a Samsung ad. It was the first execution of 23 Stories, the native ad platform that Condé Nast, controversially, said would permit advertisers to work directly with the editorial staff of its famous magazines.
For the campaign, the magazine ran a Samsung-branded cover on top of the real cover featuring a refrigerator. The Samsung cover opens to expose the inside of a stocked fridge and tips from Bon Appétit’s editors.
The reaction was, well, not positive. Bon Appétit took the unusual step of posting an Instagram video detailing how to use its magazine cover. That’s quite possibly a first, and probably not a great sign.
Needless to say, readers were not mollified by the well-intentioned effort to clear up confusion as to how to use the magazine. To read the reaction on social media, you’d have thought BonAppétit was suggesting adding peas to guacamole. On social media, where comments are usually confined to recipes, reader backlash was swift and unequivocal.
Really @bonappetit? A Samsung ad on my issue? Almost threw it out before realizing what it was. NEVER do this again! pic.twitter.com/bGvPtCMSS2
— Jennifer W. (@jennbird75) July 29, 2015
That’s an ad on the front cover of @bonappetit magazine! The FRONT cover … That’s your best idea, guys? pic.twitter.com/huDPAiqx6b — Chet Van Wert (@cvanwert) July 28, 2015
Didn’t realize that @bonappetit was now Samsung Monthly. pic.twitter.com/YUr4uuuWZ0
— Rebecca Flint Marx (@EdibleComplex) July 27, 2015
Similar outrage was expressed on Bon App’s Instagram account and Facebook page.
Several readers did made the very valid point that included in the Samsung fridge were tomatoes (heirloom, no less), which, as any foodie worth his Himalyan salt knows, is the wrong way to store the fruit. Bon Appétit for its part stayed on the sidelines of the discussion.
This is all pretty silly, though, considering this is a food magazine, after all — and the very same one that once permitted an advertiser “takeover” of the masthead (prompting a finger-wagging from Condé Nast boss S.I. Newhouse himself). Bon Appétit has also aggressively sought new sources of revenue with extensions like branded pots and pans and a Good Housekeeping-like seal of approval. It also should be noted that the Facebook and Instagram likes far outweighed the number of negative comments. A Condé Nast spokesperson emailed that 97 percent of the social feedback was positive and the integration was “performing well.”
On the other hand, as publishers increasingly push such collaborations like native ads that masquerade as editorial on their readers (all the while claiming to respect them), the Bon Appétit backlash shows that foodies are not a group to be messed with. Just ask the Times.
Image courtesy of Bon Appétit.
More in Media
As Patreon and Substack enter the mix, the livestreaming landscape is dividing creators
Platforms’ livestreaming push has highlighted an underlying divide in the community of livestreaming creators.
Digiday+ Research: Publishers were ready to depend more on first-party data. So, now what?
Publishers were ready for the move away from third-party data: the role of first-party data in generating ad revenue was set to grow significantly, and the percentage of ad impressions served by first-party data was set to increase.
Digiday+ Research Data Sheet: The state of subscription pricing
This infographic details how publishers are approaching subscription pricing and how subscriptions drive other revenue streams for publishers.