Visa’s Shiv Singh: ‘Digital is not that accountable’

Subscribe: iTunes | Stitcher | RSS

The entire premise of online marketing has been that, unlike other channels, it is fully accountable. The wealth of tracking data, theoretically, means marketers can know what’s working and what’s not. The problem is that this just isn’t true, according to Shiv Singh, global head of digital and marketing transformation at Visa.

“Digital is not that accountable,” he said on this week’s episode of the Digiday Podcast. “If I were to have a heart-to-heart conversation with my CFO or CEO, I’d be embarrassed by how blurry and foggy the entire digital media ecosystem is. If you think of the conversations we’ve been having in our industry about ad viewability, fraud, different platforms having their own networks, all of this creates more confusion, makes it much more difficult to know, when you spend a dollar, what you’re getting back in return.”

Below are lightly edited and condensed highlights from the conversation.

Shifting money to digital isn’t innovation.
For a few years now, one way for marketers have shown they’re innovative has been to bragging about how much of their marketing budgets had gone from analog channels to digital. But that’s meaningless, according to Singh.

“None of that matters. You have to be performance-driven, and you have to be able to look at all your channels and platforms on a level playing field,” he said. “The shifting to digital is a bit of a distraction. In 2016, every major marketer should have figured out by now what is the optimal mix that delivers the best results.”

“It’s hard to know the truth” in ad tech.
The shift to programmatic has created massive amounts of complexity in media. Along with that complexity has come a lack of transparency on several fronts, including what fees are assessed by whom and what channels work compared to others.

“We face a pretty fundamental challenge,” he said. “It’s very hard to look comparatively at a spend on Facebook, or a spend on Twitter, or a spend at a premium publisher and put those side-by-side with a programmatic buy. It’s so hard to look at everything on a level playing field.”

Brands are worried they’re being ripped off.
The lack of clarity in digital media has created a trust problem. Singh said often he feels like he’s buying a car from an unscrupulous salesperson.

“If I were to explain how transparent the ad ecosystem is to my CFO or CEO, he would think I’m a moron,” Sigh said. “Our industry does not have enough transparency. It’s hard to know, that dollar spent, where it goes. It’s very hard on a media plan to tell what exactly is the buy, how much of that buy is going to the consumer, what are the fees on the back end, and who exactly is getting that money.”

Facebook’s got a measurement issue.
Facebook’s ad business is booming. It doesn’t hurt that it has 1.6 billion users. But for brand building, Singh still sees issues that arise from Facebook’s proprietary approach.

“Whenever you have a walled garden you have unique metrics,” he said. “That creates more confusion.”

More in Marketing

Snapchat’s relationship with publishers is still pretty complicated

The recent layoffs have thrown a spanner in the works, while the focus on creators seems even more pronounced.

How PGL used influencer co-streams to supercharge esports viewership

For the brands whose sponsorships and ads form the backbone of esports companies’ revenue strategies, official co-streams represent a bit of a double-edged sword.

Digiday+ Research deep dive: Marketers cut way back on X spending as brand safety concerns persist

A Digiday+ Research survey found that marketers’ X usage trails far behind its social media competitors, and also that marketing spend on the platform has dropped dramatically, with brand safety being the biggest concern for marketers.