Viewpoint: Marketers need to earn consumers’ trust when it comes to surveys
Hillary Haley is svp and executive director of behavioral science at RPA.
Digital marketers have always had some concerns with survey data. But they still rely on it for critical information, like, “Is our target audience even aware of our product? Do they ‘get’ the value prop? Why didn’t they download the app?” Certain questions can’t be answered in any other way.
So when survey respondents start to clam up or get suddenly “shy” — something we are seeing right now, in response to press surrounding vulnerabilities in data privacy — we should pay close attention and take radical action. Specifically, we have to be very clear with survey respondents about how we will protect their survey data. If we fail to do this, we will forever lose access to this critical stream of data.
Here’s why this is such a big deal. We conducted the exact same survey last year and this year. The surveys were specifically designed to understand just how open and honest people are willing to be in a survey. Or, put differently, just how freaked out people are getting about sharing their data. Even when survey questions come from a trustworthy source, and even when respondents remain anonymous, people still have trepidation. And while last year that trepidation was lukewarm, this year it turned white hot.
Both years, we recruited large samples of people via Google Surveys (5,582 in May 2017 and 6,298 in April, right after Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s hearings) and asked them the same 10 questions, which were designed to assess openness and honesty. Across the board, our 2018 respondents are proving overwhelmingly more jaded. Concerningly so.
To begin with, among those we recruited, fewer people agreed to complete the survey. In 2017, 18.7 percent of recruited respondents agreed to complete the survey. But that percentage dropped by an alarming 13 percent to just 16.6 percent in 2018. In 2018, we also saw a 19 percent drop in the amount of content provided in response to open-ended questions and 23 percent more refusal when it came to offering up personal information like household income. (All these results are statistically significant at the 95 percent confidence level.) In short, people don’t want to take surveys anymore, and when they do, they seem to be breezing through as much as possible and seeking out the quickest exits.
In 2018, we also saw higher indicators of lying in survey responses, based on measures adapted from standard psychological tests of lying. For example, we saw a 10 percent climb in people stating that they “always” practice what they preach and a 12 percent uptick in people saying that they are “always” as honest as possible (both measures of “socially desirable” lying). So, along with the slackening response this year, there was also a significant hike in untrustworthiness of responses. People aren’t so sure they want to reveal much anymore.
What’s perhaps even worse is that we are seeing more reactance in 2018 as well. People aren’t just skipping through questions more quickly in 2018 and lying more often. They are also significantly more likely — in fact, 143 percent more likely — to directly attack the survey authors or otherwise rebel against the survey. For example, when asked to describe themselves, they are more likely to say things like, “mad that I have to fill this out” or “someone who hates nosy strangers.” And when asked to describe their most important personal values, they are more likely to say things like, “not doing surveys” or “none of your business.” It should be obvious why these kinds of responses are problematic and not valuable for us as marketers.
Take these trends seriously. The figures as they stand are not great, but they can get worse — to the point of survey data becoming completely worthless. Be 100 percent transparent with people about the information being asked for and how it will be used. Because right now, people aren’t so sure they want to tell us anything. If people don’t want to take surveys anymore, a unique channel of learning will become forever closed.
‘The data strategies of these companies aren’t progressive enough’: 10 Confessions on the pivot to privacy
An inside view of how privacy changes are having big consequences throughout advertising.
Why companies are using virtual concerts to introduce their users to the metaverse
Music is a spectacle, but it’s also a deeply social experience, a pairing of traits that experts believe make virtual concerts a perfect fit for companies looking to showcase the metaverse to skeptical users.
Member ExclusiveMarketing Briefing: ‘Not a hypothetical problem’: ANA CEO Bob Liodice on why there needs to be a unified effort to combat hate speech
This week, GARM and the ANA announced they are working with Pernod Ricard to scale that initiative working with brands and social platforms as well as small and medium-sized businesses.
SponsoredHow retailers can be ready for holiday shoppers this year
Suchi Sastri, managing director and partner, Boston Consulting Group As the holiday season approaches and the pandemic continues to evolve, retailers want to know what to expect. Will e-commerce continue to grow at the rate it did last year? How big of a role will in-store shopping play in holiday shopping? While it’s still early, […]
As non-endemic brands eye the gaming space, a lack of industry standards is delaying their arrival
The caution with which some brands still approach the gaming industry -- and the need for better industry standards to help brands feel more informed -- were recurring themes at last week’s Digiday Gaming Advertising Forum.
Cheat Sheet: How Apple’s ATT is giving it more influence over ad dollars
The signs that Apple is building an ads business is there — here is what we actually know.