YouTube stars have made a mint off cutting promotional deals with brands. Now, they’re getting more scrutiny over whether these promotional deals are properly disclosed.
The United Kingdom’s advertising watchdog, the Advertising Standards Authority, is pushing back against lackluster disclosures on branded YouTube content. The self-regulatory body issued a ruling on Wednesday that warns $65 billion snack giant Mondelez, which paid five popular U.K YouTubers to promote its Oreo brand. With 6.9 million subscribers across their channels, Thomas Ridgewell, Emma Blackery, PJ Ligouri, Phil Lester and Dan Howell made videos for Mondelez in which they participated in an “Oreo Lick Race.” Millions of viewers watched the YouTube stars furiously lick the cream off Oreos, but not all of them understood they were watching advertisements.
Each creator referred at some point to a relationship with Oreo, both in the videos and accompanying text descriptions. But statements like “thanks to Oreo for making this video possible” are not sufficient disclosures, according to the ASA, which was prompted to investigate the campaign by a BBC journalist. The videos have since been amended to include a clearer statement, “This is a paid for advertisement,” as a video annotation overlay and in the descriptions.
The ASA ruling, the first to mention YouTube, sets a new standard for the region. “The ads must not appear again in their current form,” reads the ruling. “We told Mondelez U.K. Ltd to ensure that future ads in this medium made their commercial intent clear prior to consumer engagement.”
That last part is key: The ASA is demanding labeling that communicates whether content is an ad before potential viewers click play.
“There is nothing wrong with vloggers entering into a commercial relationship, they just have to be up front with their viewers about that fact,” said Hannah Law, press and public affairs assistant for the ASA. “This means making a distinction between ads and editorial-based content so viewers can make an informed choice.”
An independent regulator, the ASA has the authority to apply a variety of sanctions to advertisers who don’t play by its rules. It can invoke mandatory pre-vetting for the most serious or persistent offenders, requiring advertisers to submit their marketing materials for review before publication for up to two years.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also requires Web video makers to disclose endorsements, sponsorships and other payments from brands. It doesn’t have specific regulations governing YouTube, as the site falls under its 2009 Testimonials & Endorsement Report (and the 2013 “.com Disclosures” update), according to Mary Engle, the FTC’s associate director for advertising practices.
“The basics are that the disclosure has to be in words that the consumer can understand — it can’t just be a URL or a link, it has to be in a place where consumers will see it,” Engle told Gamasutra in October. “Certainly as a practical matter, the best thing would be to put it in the video itself, and for the person to say it.”
The ASA’s Mondelez ruling points to a potential regulatory headache for the burgeoning YouTube creator economy. Many creators have global followings, which attracts global brands like Mondelez. It also means that YouTube stars will need to comply with the most stringent global requirements. So even if the FTC isn’t taking aggressive action, the fact that the ASA (or European Union) is means the creators must comply — or risk possible sanctions.
Several multichannel networks, which negotiate advertising deals between top YouTube talent and major brands, declined to comment for this story. A representative for one MCN, which also works with Mondelez, said its branded campaigns are clearly labeled across all social platforms. But given the labeling of its recent branded series, which doesn’t appear on a brand channel or include a brand name in the title, the ASA would surely debate that claim.
There’s ample reason for advertisers to downplay the brand connection: Most obviously, it could limit audience appeal. In June, YouTube brand management software maker Octoly released a study examining the video game ecosystem on YouTube. It found that views for user-generated video content outnumbered branded content views 19-to-1 in that category, even after accounting for paid promotion.
But in general, disclosure is in everyone’s best interest, said eMarketer analyst Paul Verna. “As a general principle, people don’t like to be confused or misled,” he said. “It’s just not in the best interest of long-term brand health to do that just to get people to click on an ad.”
Florist brand uses video to connect with families during the holiday season
FTD LLC, also known as Florists' Transworld Delivery, is looking to stand out during the holiday season through connected TV with the goal to drive brand recognition and incremental traffic.
Why this luxury hotel chain bets on user generated content’s ‘power of the people’
As UGC becomes more important in today's growing creator economy, Red Carnation Hotels holds steadfast to relying on it.
Is the future of metaverse advertising cross-platform activations?
Some marketers believe this type of cross-platform activation is the future of metaverse advertising — but not everyone is convinced quite yet.
SponsoredHow premium programmatic video is evolving
Leo O’Connor, senior vice president, advertising, Paramount Change in the advertising and media industry often feels slow and chaotic — but when viewed with perspective, change happens relatively fast and follows a logical path. This is certainly the case with programmatic advertising and the rise of streaming. Audiences want the freedom to watch content however […]
Whisper it: some advertisers still like Elon Musk’s Twitter
Twitter is an anathema to a lot of advertisers right now -- but not all of them.
Member ExclusiveMarketing Briefing: ‘The answer is no’: Why agencies need to reject RFPs with egregiously extended payment terms
Despite the abnormality of the 360-day request, the focus from some clients and procurement officers on extending payment windows has many calling for agencies to reject participating in pitches with such requests going forward.