Upon announcing their intention to merge into the largest ad agency holding company in the world, the official word from Publicis and Omnicom was that the move was all about data.
In an interview with CNBC, Omnicom CEO John Wren explained the merger, saying that gathering, sorting and using data had become a fundamental part of agency work, and combining would help the two agencies do the job better. The new mega agency, Wren and Publicis CEO Maurice Levy argued, would be able to use data at a scale that would put them on par with data rich companies such as Facebook and Google – internet behemoths with the ability to cut out agencies by taking their data offerings directly to brands.
While the argument may seem compelling on the surface, it’s far-fetched, most likely a smokescreen meant to ward off anti-trust regulators by positioning the company not as a collection of ad agencies but a data entity along the lines of Facebook, Google and other platforms.
“Creativity, scale and media buying are what is being thought of during this merger,” said Andy Monfried, CEO of Lotame, a data management platform. The size of the new company, Monfried told Digiday, would not give it an inherent advantage over what the two agencies could do with data and technology on their own. “I do not think this merger accomplishes that objective.”
The new Publicis-Omnicom conglomerate, if approved, would be a $23 billion dollar company, dwarfing the rest of the agency world but still modest in comparison to $50.2 billion dollar Google. It would benefit Publicis-Omnicom to be placed next to those big tech companies in the eyes of regulators, which is why the data angle angle makes sense.
But, on a practical level, the merger is not likely to lead to data capabilities much more robust than what the two large agencies could have realized on their own, leaving some scratching their heads as to why the argument was made in the first place. Dave Morgan, a veteran of ad technology and CEO of TV targeter Simulmedia, has pointed out that getting bigger doesn’t improve the company’s ability to parse that data.
“You’re not going to create the next MediaMath, or Videology, or Facebook, or Google out of this,” he told AllThingsD.
“Google, Facebook, Twitter and Yahoo have been recently mentioned as companies posing threats to the agency holding companies,” Peter Stabler, a senior analyst in Wells Fargo’s Silicon Valley office, wrote recently. “On this front, we simply disagree.” Stabler said that agencies and social platforms “will continue to be more friend than foe,” adding that Wells Fargo was not convinced scale would bring the new company any significant advantages in the near term.
Ari Paparo, an executive at Bazaarvoice who spent six years working at Google and DoubleClick, said that he was surprised to hear his former employer mentioned as a competitor to ad agencies. “They’re Google’s biggest customers,” he said. “Google has very good relationships with both companies, so it’s particularly odd that they would say that.”
And there’s more than a little wishful thinking for Wren and Levy to put themselves in the league of Silicon Valley giants. Sure, WPP bought 24/7 RealMedia, but it and Omnicom are pretty much garden-variety services companies. Jonathan Mendez, CEO of ad tech firm Yieldbot, pointed out that Google owns 13 data centers while Publicis and Omnicom lease three.
“Let’s get real,” he tweeted. “This is not about competing in big data with Google.”
Paparo added that while agencies may do a lot of deals involving data, their clients don’t generally give them the rights to it, so the data argument doesn’t really stand up.
“For the vast majority of their digital buys, the data is generally owned by the end customer and having more customers doesn’t give you any leverage,” he explained.
What that means is we’re left with two people-based services business coming together in the hopes of saving money, unfortunately through needing fewer people.
Image via Bradley Weber on Flickr.
State Farm to skip out on a Super Bowl ad this year, going all in on TikTok instead
With a $7 million price tag, State Farm is skipping out on a traditional Super Bowl spot in favor of a TikTok campaign this year.
Brands stay silent on Tyre Nichols killing as marketers signal it as an industry backslide
Compared to the things that were said and acted upon during the murder of George Floyd and the protests that took place three years ago, many brands have been relatively quiet around Tyre Nichols.
Giant Spoon picks the Super Bowl to test ChatGPT’s marketing chops
As ChatGPT and AI rise in popularity, one marketing agency has chosen the Super Bowl to try out the technology's creative capabilities.
SponsoredAdvertising predictions that will shake up the media industry in 2023
Chris Kelly, CEO, Upwave Like many people, marketers and advertisers were ready to see 2022 come to a close. A year that started off promising was assailed by inflation, layoffs and the disastrous effects of RSV, the flu and additional COVID strains. Still, despite an uncertain outlook for 2023, there are plenty of reasons for […]
How the layoffs at 100 Thieves underscore esports’ creator-executive leadership problems
Esports organizations have long been notorious for elevating professional gamers to more business-focused senior executive roles — and for suffering scandals as a result.
Hyatt, Lacrosse Unlimited, Lulu’s tap college athletes’ authenticity to target Gen Z
Hyatt, Lacrosse Unlimited and Lulu's are among brands highlighting partnerships with college athletes in an effort to reach new consumers, particularly those in the Gen Z cohort.