Fans rip the new Power Rangers suits for sexism. And being ugly
Perhaps it’s only appropriate that after nearly a 20 year hiatus, the first battle the rebooted Power Rangers are facing is with the internet.
Yesterday, fans received their first official look at the fighters’ new suits, ditching the stretchy spandex for a “translucent extraterrestrial armor that crystallizes around their bodies,” according to Entertainment Weekly.
The movie is set to be released next spring, but the suits are all ready being pelted from a barrage of complaints online about how ugly they are.
Here’s a sampling:
@EW @PowerRangers keep it, I didn’t sign up for this level of disrespect against my childhood, ya’ll need to chill pic.twitter.com/LT8SBvsi3o
— tateyana.♕ (@alyciadobreva) May 5, 2016
@EW @PowerRangers Looks like Daft Punk is about to release its next album.
— Gabe (@shimrra) May 5, 2016
@EW @PowerRangers Those look pretty heavy to be doing…ANYTHING
— Kaiju Ninja (@OfficeSquatch) May 5, 2016
But, as pointed out by model Chrissy Teigen, it’s the two female fighters’ footwear that is problematic because they’re wearing wedges. (The original cast all wear the same shoes.)
go go power….WEDGES????? pic.twitter.com/Lam5s8X9NJ
— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) May 5, 2016
That was followed up with dozens of complaints blasting the outfits for being sexist:
@chrissyteigen I’m so irritated by this. What the fuck.
— Missy Q. (@chibi_missy) May 5, 2016
@chrissyteigen Because costume-makers still think “female” = “heels”. {sigh}
— Charles Lewis III (@simonpatt) May 5, 2016
@chrissyteigen MY EXACT THOUGHTS. and the fucking molded breasts? Get the fuck outttt
— padge (@paigehint0n) May 5, 2016
On the Huffington Post, a writer also took issue with 20th Century Fox’s decision, writing “if the men’s costumes don’t include wedges, why do the women need them? Because they obviously care about how they look when fighting alien invaders. Le duh.”
And a Forbes headline rips it, writing the new suits “fail the gender neutral test,” adding that it’s an “eye-rolling call, one that plays right into certain gender tropes and would-be stereotypes, precisely because it was avoidable.”
Go, go outrage!
-
Brands extend inclusive marketing efforts beyond Black History Month
As more inclusive marketing becomes the norm, brands like IPSY, SiriusXM and Jack Daniels ramp up for Black History Month and beyond.
-
Snapchat’s pitch to advertisers is starting to feel as ephemeral as its content — and its Q4 results prove it
While it may be too soon to count out Snapchat's ads business entirely, rewiring it into something more appealing to advertisers won't be easy — especially when so many marketers aren't advertising much there in the first place.
-
Marketers seek agency-of-record relationships with influencer agencies as influencer marketing matures
Marketers are moving away from a project-based approach to a long-term vision with influencer marketing agencies participating in strategy meetings along with other agencies rather than being an afterthought.
-
SponsoredQ&A: How Jounce Media and Teads are framing SPO’s role in driving sustainability
As supply chain concerns abound, marketers are increasingly focusing on the main motivators that drive efficiency in their operations, including financial considerations, supply chain transparency and, most recently, environmental concerns. Sustainability has not always been at the forefront of the digital video buying process for the ad industry, but brands like Teads are taking steps […]
-
Why acquisitions could be the inevitable future for embattled in-game ad companies
As game developers and big tech companies alike realize the revenue-generating power of mobile gaming, they have engaged in a flurry of merger and acquisition activity.
-
Marketing Briefing: With younger consumers questioning brands’ trustworthiness, marketers turn to scenario planning
More certainty that a marketing play is an authentic fit for a given brand is key as consumers are more skeptical of advertising than ever.
