Native’s measurement problem, in 5 charts
Publishers are pinning their hopes on native advertising to rescue their shaky ad business. But that’s dependent on getting brands on board.
And brands have plenty of obstacles, from doubts about its effectiveness to a lack of consensus about how it should be priced and measured. Now comes new data from the agency side that further underscores the uncertainty. Contently went so far as to call the state of affairs a “crisis of confidence.”
Few marketers feel strongly the yardsticks they’re using are effectively measuring business results. Contently surveyed more than 300 marketers this spring on their views about native advertising, and found that only 9 percent are “very confident” in their metrics. About an equal portion are “kind of” confident and unconfident, so maybe it’s not all bad.
Despite the fact that most marketers want to be able to connect branded content to sales, most are using traditional publishing metrics to evaluate the success of their content, according to Contently. Amazingly, 7 percent admitted to not measuring anything.
At the end of the day, marketers most want to be able to measure how branded content changes people’s opinions about their brand and affects their purchase intent.
Uncertainty about measurement isn’t stopping marketers from investing in native. The Industry Index by DMR and TripleLift surveyed 100 digital media buyers in May. Seventy-three percent of buyers said they have a native ad strategy, with 67 percent planning to increase their use of the format this year. Native ad spending is expected to triple from 2013 to 2015, according to Purch. But there’s no telling how much more that would be if agencies had more confidence in the format.
Getting enough scale for native ads is a challenge for marketers. But despite the proliferation of companies professing to be able to marry native with scale, buyers are uncertain about whether native can be automated. Nearly two thirds said they doubt native can successfully be bought programmatically.
‘We’re letting Facebook grade their own homework’: Here’s how advertisers’ desired changes differ from overall boycott
The overall goals of civil rights advocates organizing the boycott differ slightly from those of advertisers.
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.
Member Exclusive‘Are you going to put people over profit?’: As Facebook boycott continues, DTCs still running ads on the platform in a tricky spot
The Facebook boycott is part of a larger cultural shift towards a more “values-based consumerism.”
SponsoredWhy data clean rooms are a start, but not enough
Clean rooms are intended to be a “safe space” for brands to collaborate with walled gardens, but the greater opportunity for all brands is bringing together all of their data to create a single source of truth that they own and can continually enrich.
WTF is California’s new, and potentially stronger, privacy law?
In November, California residents will vote on the state's second privacy law, which is basically the CCPA 2.0
‘Influencer deals are being paused’: As Facebook boycott begins in earnest, influencer marketing feels a sting
The latest move to pause influencer marketing comes as marketers are not only reconsidering where their ads appear and the kind of content they appear next to, but as they work to figure out how they can better support Black creators and Black-owned businesses following the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.