How Joshua Lowcock is bringing his refreshing perspective to brand safety

The best truths are the ones everyone knows to be true but nobody really talks about. In the swirl of activity surrounding brand-safety crises, those in digital media knew what the real underlying cause behind the problem was: the clients, who continued to prefer cheaper environments to run their ads in despite the risks.

Which was why when Joshua Lowcock, UM’s first global chief brand-safety officer, says as much, it’s like a breath of fresh air. Lowcock, who was appointed to the role late last year, is also the first exec on a new Advertiser Protection Bureau at the 4A’s, an industry response to the continuing brand-safety crises faced by advertisers on platforms. He is charged with changing decades of behavior for clients to accept that brand safety comes at a cost, and that it needs to be a priority, which often means fighting what he calls an “industry bias,” sometimes driven by procurement toward buying and evaluating media on the lowest price. That means helping them balance across all dimensions, including ROI and safe environments, plus privacy compliance.

“He has a unique ability to be an advocate and champion, yet push and challenge the industry with his compelling arguments and perspective, all while being the most liked person in the room,” says Robin Steinberg, the former evp at SparkFoundry Publishing Investment.

In the past couple of years, YouTube has served ads for major advertisers alongside Nazi and pedophilia content multiple times, Facebook has been under fire for ongoing brand safety concerns and Twitter accounts like Sleeping Giants have made taking screenshots of ads alongside hateful and bigoted content a popular and effective pressure tactic. But it’s been a spiral — public relations nightmare followed by big talk about pulling back from platforms to, ultimately, not much happening at all.

For Lowcock, the issue isn’t a failure of technology, necessarily: It’s a straightforward realization that when it comes to brand safety, more advertisers need to put their money where their mouth is. As pressure to make the most out of every marketing dollar arises, brands are caught in the place of trying to do things cheaper — and brand safety is actually pretty expensive.

“There are also still far too many advertisers who are reactive rather than proactive on brand safety – which is why I don’t yet have people with equivalent roles or responsibility to me on the client side,” says Lowcock.

More in Marketing

Why the New York Times is forging connections with gamers as it diversifies its audience

The New York Times is not becoming a gaming company. But as it continues to diversify its editorial offerings for the digital era, the Times has embraced puzzle gamers as one of its core captive audiences, and it is taking ample advantage of its advantageous positioning in the space in 2024.

Why B2B marketers are advertising more like consumer brands to break through a crowded marketplace

Today’s marketing landscape is more fragmented than ever. Like consumer brands, business brands are looking to stand out in a crowded and competitive marketplace, making marketing tactics like streaming ads, influencers and humorous spots more appealing.

As draft puts WNBA in spotlight, the NBA is speeding up ballplayers’ transition to creators

The NBA’s star athletes are its greatest marketing asset.