Clinton released yesterday a limited edition line of expensive shirts designed by Marc Jacobs, Tory Burch and Public School called “Made of History.” The collection, described as a way “help elect the first woman president of the United States, and Democrats from coast to coast,” features three distinct designs.
The shirts comes at a cost: $45 a pop, which is $15 more than the other shirts for sale in the online store. Clinton’s campaign told Vogue that the t-shirts are aimed at giving her supporters “an extraordinary new way to show their enthusiasm” for the candidate. They are threatening to release more clothing soon.
While Clinton isn’t the first Democratic candidate to roll out a line of designer couture (Barack Obama had a similar line of high-end designer clothes for his 2008 and 2012 campaigns), it might be the collection that induces the most eye rolls.
“My main issue with the t-shirts is simply that they’re ugly,” Adam Wray, the curator of Fashion ReDef newsletter, told Digiday. He adds that this, in addition to other millennial-pandering items like the “Chillary Clinton” beer koozie, is not going to help her flagging standing among young people.
“Stuff like this makes her seem like a brand saying bae — genuinely out of touch, flailing for relevance. She should stick with the logo tees,” he said. “Even the pantsuit tees, though kinda corny, feel authentic, and I think that’s the most important target for a politician’s election cycle merchandise to hit.”
Another detail raising eyebrows is the price. “I’d love to buy this Hillary Clinton, but it’s a $45 tee shirt — [probably] not the best strategy #elitist,” wrote a downtrodden supporter on Twitter. Another tweeted: “$45 for a shirt, clearly she’s the candidate of the people!”
Still, the designer tees did have a few fans. “The new @HillaryClinton “Made for History” shirts are giving me LIFE,” a fan tweeted. Even Vogue editor Anna Wintour, who can probably easily afford the shirts, showed her support:
— Vanessa Friedman (@VVFriedman) February 18, 2016
Member ExclusiveDigiday+ Research: Who will gain and who will lose when (if?) the third-party cookie goes away?
There is endless speculation about what the world without third-party cookies will look like -- or even if it will ever come to be. Digiday asked publishers, agencies and brands about who they think will gain and who they think will lose following the death of the third-party cookie.
Why a sports betting company will brand the new train line to MetLife Stadium
As part of this effort, a variety of print and digital assets have been developed, as well as the official rebranding of all of the NJ Transit system's signage and advertising to accommodate the new rail line. A clear understanding of the financial agreement was not provided.
How Squarespace is marketing more directly to the creator economy
With new features and ads, Squarespace is the latest tech company to market more directly to creators
Sponsored<strong>How marketers are responding to shoppers’ wants this holiday season</strong>
Matthew Tilley, executive director, marketing, Vericast With the holidays right around the corner, the economy may force some consumers to adjust their plans and stretch their dollars even further. While some shoppers may rein in their spending, others will still go all out despite a cloudy economic outlook. Given the current economic climate, consumers are […]
Member ExclusiveMarketing Briefing: With pressure mounting on Q4, some marketers are planning to roll out holiday sales early
Marketers are rolling out holiday marketing and sales early as economic uncertainty persists and pressure builds for the fourth quarter.
‘Multiplier effect’: Lower match rates in data clean rooms are being given a much-needed boost
Publishers looking for a bit of good news in their search for sustainable ways to scale their data sans third-party cookies may have got some thanks to data clean rooms.