Dolce & Gabbana tried selling a $2,400 ‘slave’ sandal

Dolce & Gabbana is just now learning that slavery is bad.

The realization was triggered by a gladiator-like sandal it was selling online called the “Slave Sandal in Napa Leather with PomPoms” — for $2,400.

Technically, as Footwear News points out, the word slave is an actual shoe term: It is, apparently, a “description for a particular lace-up shoe silhouette.” But the term has fallen out of favor, taking a back seat to the phrase “gladiator sandals” for glaringly obvious reasons. Also, it only takes an ounce of common sense to know avoiding the word is smart marketing.

The listing, which has been edited, still lives on in screenshots:

dolce-gabanna-slave-sandal-02

Other brands, including Saks and Moda Operandi, have smartly left out the word “slave” from their descriptions although the term appears in Lyst’s URL, Racked points out.

Not surprisingly, people on Twitter were mortified. “I’m sorry, but WTF is wrong with people?!,” one person tweeted. Another added: “Okay but how did D&G think it was okay to name some sandals ‘slave sandal’ wow.”

Italian Vogue could have warned them against the moniker: In 2011 the publisher was heavily lashed online for featuring “slave earrings” on its website before apologizing. But then again, Dolce & Gabbana has a habit of courting controversy: Last year Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana publicly criticized in vitro fertilization.

The designer hasn’t responded for comment. Upon further inspection, perhaps the sandal’s design is worth apologizing over too.

https://digiday.com/?p=165101

More in Marketing

‘They’re wrong’: The Trade Desk CEO denies Roku rival rumor amid reports it’s building a smart TV operating system

Speaking earlier today at Exchangewire’s ATS conference in London, CEO Jeff Green denied rumors that The Trade Desk is cooking up a smart TV operating system.

Retail media frenzy muddies negotiations with brands, who agency execs say must spend or ‘suffer the consequences’

In the retail media network arms race, agencies say their brand clients are feeling the squeeze, and are being pressured to spend big with retailers to secure and maintain premium in-store shelf space.

Decoding the jargon behind Google’s antitrust ad tech trial: a glossary for the confused

From industry terms like “header bidding” to “AdX” to “DSPs” to internal Google terms, such as “Jedi Blue,” there’s a lot to wrap your head around.