A marketer’s guide to the looming EU Global Data Protection Regulation

The enforcement of the new European data privacy laws, which prevent brands from using a person’s data unless they have explicit permission, is less than a year away, and it seems advertisers are none the wiser to the risks and rewards the General Data Protection Regulation brings.

Not even the threat of an eye-bulging fine that could inflate to as much as 4 percent of a company’s global revenues for flouting the law has jostled many brands into getting up to speed on the changes. Still, nearly half of businesses will be unprepared next May, according to the Data & Marketing Association’s study of 250 respondents.

The key takeaways

What GDPR means for marketers
Marketers will need to take greater responsibility when processing personal data. From weeding out possible risks to privacy in marketing campaigns to accepting that non-compliant databases will have to be scrapped, that heightened responsibility comes with a lot of headache.

“Reconnecting with your database is the most important single consideration in the run-up to GDPR,” advised Zach Thornton, the DMA’s public affairs manager. “Marketers will need to reconnect with their customers and ensure that their consent statements or other ways they have collected personal data will be compliant under GDPR.”

That could lead to a greater reliance on the likes of Facebook and Google for targeting and tracking, given marketers may have less data to do so themselves. Plus, the investments needed to shape GDPR-compliant systems are costly, and the threat of non-compliance could give executives another reason to pare back on funding new data-led innovations.

“We have noticed a significant uptick in GDPR-related inquiries this year, but many companies are reluctant to allocate sufficient budgets to their legal, compliance and IT teams to ensure that they are ready for the changes when they apply next May,” said Simon Morrissey, partner and head of the data and privacy practice group at Lewis Silkin.

“This is resulting in significantly scaled-down GDPR compliance projects that are quite limited in scope and therefore increasing the risk of missing key gaps in an organization’s ability to comply with and demonstrate compliance with the GDPR,” he said.

Changes must also be made to the contracts in the media supply chain to clearly lay out who has the obligation to obtain consent — generally the first-party publisher — and who has the obligation to provide transparent information about how the data is used — the ad-serving provider.

Unilever and John Lewis have spoken about how this might impact the way they adapt to personal data becoming more of a personal asset. After all, anyone with a garage can effectively do what a fast-moving consumer goods company does when it comes to distribution and advertising, meaning the right customer data becomes the new competitive edge — rather than scale.