Digiday Publishing Summit

Connect with execs from Axios, The New York Times, Paramount and more.

VIEW PASSES

Brands want you to know they too are #BostonStrong

Brands are still finding their way in social media. At times, the rush to be relevant and “human” runs up against the boundaries of good taste especially when it comes to how marketers handle tragic occasions.

The latest case in point is the anniversary of the Boston Marathon bombing. Tomorrow, the Boston Marathon will happen again, in what is sure to be an emotional day, often commemorated in social media with the hashtag #BostonStrong. The Boston Marathon is also a huge commercial endeavor, generating an estimated $175 million in economic activity.

“Boston Strong” is a brand unto itself. A play on Livestrong and the “Army Strong” tagline, it sprung into existence following the terrorist attack at the marathon finish line a year ago. The Boston Globe noted the phrase “shows just how much we have learned from the advertising world in the creation of catch phrases that “stick,” even when they are inspired by utterly unexpected events.” Indeed, there are no fewer than eight trademark applications for everything from Boston Strong beer to Boston Strong coffee already in the works. The business of America continues to be business.

There’s an argument to be made that brands need to be more human, and expressing their own solidarity is a natural way. And then there’s the idea that some apparel company shouldn’t capitalize on a tragedy to sell socks. Justin Miller, a marketing and digital strategist, has an office a couple blocks from the finish line in Boston. He is firmly in the latter camp — and shared examples of what he feels are marketers stepping over the line with #BostonStrong.

There have been a pretty significant amount of companies that are tacking on #BostonStrong or Boston Strong to their brands, and although I don’t think it’s malicious, I think it’s inappropriate because they’re using a terrorist attack to position themselves and their brand with consumers. No Under Armour, you’re not Boston Strong, you’re an apparel company. If you ask me — a marketing person who has to think about things like this for his own company — the play isn’t connecting yourself with the tragedy but acknowledging it. Instead of being Boston Strong, you should be thinking of the victims on the anniversary of the tragedy and then go back to talking about how your innovative fabric can feel light while keeping your body temperature down. It’s phony and cheap.

Here’s a selection of marketers using #BostonStrong. Weigh in with your own thoughts on which hit the mark and which miss it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image via Shutterstock

More in Marketing

To manage 300,000 creators, Unilever automates everything but the relationship

Unilever is using AI to vet creators and automate workflows as it scales a 300,000-creator network without handing over creative decisions.

Nike versus Adidas: Who’s spending more in race to claim the World Cup crown?

With the World Cup at the midway point, ad spend estimates show the apparel rivals taking opposite tacks in their media approaches.

Platforms’ AI dilemma: scale without sameness

Using AI to create content risks a lot of it looking the same. But the platforms agree creativity will always come from humans.