Data is the issue du jour. CEOs are now frequently asked what their “big data strategies” are, and CMOs are being pressured to turn the volumes of information their companies collect into business insights and cunning marketing strategies.
That’s prompting many clients to panic and to question where their data lives, who has access to it, and what exactly it’s being used for. Many are turning to their agencies with concerns that their data is being used in ways they didn’t approve and perhaps don’t fully understand. Agencies often use one client’s data to help inform activity for their other clients, for example. While that’s not necessarily an issue, clients are becoming aware that they often know little about what goes on behind the curtain — and need to take back more control.
“We as an industry are just trying to figure out who has rights to what when it comes to data,” said Mike Baker, CEO of data and marketing management company DataXu. “Clients need education. They’re often unaware of what’s going on behind the scenes. Do agencies have the right to use client data even though the client technically owns it? These things can be unclear.”
Therein lies the problem. Ad tech is often said to present a complexity problem. But a better way to look at it is a confusion issue. It is confusing to figure out who does what and how they’re different from all the other logos. In the same way, a client might be concerned about its “data” without truly understanding what that means. Data, after all, is a broad term that can mean just about everything.
According to agencies, clients do “own” their data in the vast majority of instances. But agencies are well aware of its value and have no incentive to give up control of it to the client. It’s less an issue of ownership than it is of control and access. Relationships and contracts vary, of course, but typically it’s understood that agencies have rights to it on their behalf.
But the reality of the situation is that most data-management platforms, DSPs, trading desks and other data platforms sit on the agency side, not with clients. Therefore, even if brands wanted to take control or “ownership” of their own data, they’re simply not in a position to do so at present.
“Sometimes uninformed clients are contacting agencies and saying, ‘give me my data,’ but they don’t really know what they’re asking for. How are they going to give it to them, on a thumb-drive?” said one agency exec. “If brands want control over their data, that’s fine, but until they have the tools in-house to deal with, it’s really a moot point.”
Just because agencies typically end up controlling data on their clients’ behalf, that doesn’t mean they have the right to use it as they see fit, clients themselves warn.
“All of our contracts indicate we own everything,” said one brand marketer. “To my knowledge, it’s not being used in any other manner than to benefit us. If I learned otherwise, there would be potentially serious ramifications.”
That said, many brands admit they’d probably have little idea if it was being used for purposes they didn’t approve of.
Agency execs argue it’s in clients’ interests to allow agencies free access to their data, in aggregate at least. It might help the agency itself build its business, but ultimately that pooled data benefits all of their customers. A smarter agency means smarter campaigns, one argued.
But ultimately, brands are worried about the data issue because, like a lot of areas in digital, they don’t fully understand it. It’s a complicated area and their immediate reaction is to demand ownership without fully understanding what, exactly, that means.
“It’s like every issue in ad tech: It’s really complex. Clients need first to understand the practices and exactly what data is being used for what, and then take it from there,” recommended one agency trading desk executive. “Clients need to understand what they’re asking for and why, not just react because big data is being written about in the press and their bosses are asking questions about it.”
Image via Shutterstock
How the push for anti-‘woke’ advertising could create controversy for brand startups
As some push back on inclusive marketing, startups with more to lose sound off.
U by Kotex believes normalizing periods will help it reach millennials, Gen Z
U by Kotex is looking to continue with recent streaming ads, digital spots, banner ads, shopper marketing and influencer partnerships focused on “Normalizing Periods.”
Can Meta remain the ‘holy grail of paid advertising’ with challenges, challengers and Advantage+?
With more competitors and less solutions, advertisers sound off on Meta's social ad dominance.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
With TikTok star Keith Lee, Pepsi hopes to draw Gen Z to Black-owned restaurants
Pepsi is teaming up with TikTok food reviewer Keith Lee to promote the best Black-owned restaurants with a focus on Gen Z.
Digiday+ Research Briefing: CMO Strategies — How marketers’ social platform budgets stack up
In this week's Digiday+ Research Briefing, we share focal points from Digiday's recently released reports on how marketers’ social platform budgets stack up, and how agencies are feeling less pessimistic about the death of the third-party cookie.