Aaron Dodez is vp, associate director, digital marketing at independent ad agency, RPA.
There is no shortage of false prophets in marketing, each touting the “newest” tactic like native advertising (GoTo.com from 1998 says hello) that promises to finally make consumers love — or at least not notice — our ads. Yet inevitably, every time a fairly commonplace marketing tactic — advertorials, cookie-based targeting, Facebook’s feed testing — is placed in front of consumers, the result is ridicule and horror.
As an industry, we’ve deemed it OK, for example, for an oral-hygiene brand to serve consumers an endless stream of promoted tweets during the World Cup “real-timing” each match and subsequent goal. So maybe it’s not such a bad thing that we marketers are being derided for feeling the need to insert ourselves into every conversation – “Goal! Buy my mouthwash!” – like a needy 4-year-old.
Sure, it’s arguably not as intrusive as a 15-second video ad at the beginning of a 30-second sports highlight. Or auto-play videos or interstitial ads that block all the content on a screen. But it is still interruptive marketing.
Let’s accept this fundamental truth: Brands aren’t humans, and if they were, they would hate most ads like normal humans do.
As digital fragmentation accelerates, be it through the increased unbundling of mobile apps or the shift away from mass consumer social networks toward private messaging, we are in an environment where consumers are increasingly empowered — and advertisers are marginalized.
Counteracting this means thinking about content marketing differently. Maybe your brand’s significant budget line item for Facebook maintenance could in part be allocated toward niche social networks like the community network Nextdoor, home-oriented Houzz, product-focused Polyvore (or even the canine-centric Dogster, if that’s your thing). Email, once unsexy, should be back on all marketers’ radars as well: It’s mobile, personalized and a one-on-one communication with customers.
In short, brands should look for ways to be niche publishers, not broadcast advertisers. Talk to a smaller, more relevant and engaged group who will take your content, share it and integrate it into their relevant conversations on their platforms of choice for you. This is a bottom-up content strategy versus a top-down interruptive one. Be more like HGTV, not NBC.
That means committing to producing more unique content – even great content ideas can die on the terrifying mountain of frequency – and shifting the storytelling away from the one-off, campaign varietal marked by a formal start and end date.
YouTube has been trying to get brands out of this mindset by preaching a strategy called “Hero, Hub, Hygiene.” Higher production, but infrequent “hero” videos have been no problem for brands to embrace. But both hub (regularly scheduled content) and hygiene (always-on videos around consumer interests) have been underutilized, as many brands — and agencies — still think low-cost production equals poor-quality content.
However, it’s easy to make the opposite case. Fewer, pricier content pieces result in increased risk to ROI, causing fear-based, self-fulfilling watering down of content. It’s why Vine is so appealing: Its six-second format limits both the potential budget and adherence to brand guidelines. Case in point, Lowe’s award-winning “Fix in Six” Vines.
The proof of this approach lies with premium channels like Nerdist and thousands of successful YouTube content creators who have amassed subscribers, engagement and views through consistent, focused lower-production-quality content. Admittedly, few brands outside of GoPro (serendipitously, their product produces thrilling visual content) have been able to duplicate this approach. But, as Tom Hanks said in “A League of Their Own”: “It’s supposed to be hard. If it wasn’t hard, everyone would do it.”
Obviously, this narrow-but-more-frequent approach needs to be overlaid with both exceptional content ideas and the appropriate allocation of paid dollars for visibility.
No matter what you do, it’s doubtful consumers will ever love marketing. But maybe you can help them dislike it just a little bit less.
Can Snap make it as an AR company?
The real question Snap faces is whether adding AR elements to its platform will help it continue growing in the face of competition and uncertainty.
How NFTs could evolve for brands — now that marketers know what they actually are
NFTs are finally growing out of crypto novelty into next-gen loyalty tools. Tyler Moebius, founder and CEO of SmartMedia Technologies, explains where else they can go.
Why digital clutter is driving brands to rethink the value of newspapers advertising
GE, Equinox, Take 5 Oil and agency TBWA New York are among those investing in newspaper ads to generate social media buzz in an ever-more cluttered digital environment.
SponsoredHow ad tech is tackling waste by optimizing supply chains
Sponsored by Bidtellect The programmatic and digital advertising industry is well aware of the inefficiencies in buying and selling — from auction duplication and volume bias to multi-integrations and reselling — but how did it get this out of control? How can we fix it? A redundant, multiple-step process to ad delivery has become the norm, […]
The ‘retirement’ of M&M spokescandies raises questions about viral marketing, edgy content
Marketers have mixed feelings and questions about the value of viral, stunt marketing after M&M's "retirement" of its spokescandies.
With TikTok’s growing list of issues, should marketers think twice about the platform?
There is a growing list of issues that TikTok needs to resolve, but marketers seem unfazed and continue to be enthralled by the platform.