In the early days of social media, companies began to roll out their own branded communities, or social hubs, that ultimately failed. Remember Pepperidge Farm’s “Art of the Cookie” social hub from 2007? No? Doubt you’re alone.
That phase of social media ended in a swift death, as brands adopted the fish-where-the-fish-are approach advocated by your favorite social media guru. But now brands like Dell and Procter & Gamble are finding ways to roll out social hubs, learning from the mistakes of the past and not treating social as a zero-sum game.
Dell, for instance, has built out its Dell IT Social Hub. It’s basically a one-stop shop online that pulls in feeds of the most recent IT-related news and updates from Dell’s social media channels and blogs, keeping everything in one place and connecting with customers and technology enthusiasts.
Procter & Gamble’s Pampers brand is another example. The brand just rolled out its Pampers Village community, where moms can connect with one another and with Pampers. The idea behind this initiative is: Build a community, and the brand will be stronger.
In both cases, the social hubs aren’t intended to replace Facebook or Twitter, as these destinations obviously have more scale than a built-from-scratch branded community. The simple numbers dictate that. Brands don’t stand a chance of drawing the kind of numbers on their own social properties as on a platform like Facebook. Pampers’ branded social hub boasts approximately 7,000 members, which is peanuts compared to its 1 million fans on Facebook.
“With the past efforts of building branded communities online, a lot has changed since 2007,” said Wendy Lea, CEO of Get Satisfaction. “One angle to consider is the discoverability of content. A lot of the problems with these sites [back then] was they were all about pushing out information and not really focused on the interaction aspect. The momentum has shifted because the conversations are now indexed and then discoverable by other consumers who go to Google and ask a question or reference a product. And the sharing features have improved. These are two big movements that can affect a brand’s community and connecting to the consumer. Nowadays it is completely different. It’s the open-network effect.”
Consumers are much more conditioned today to share then they were five years ago. However, their Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest are their top platforms of choice. Even a big behemoth like Google is having trouble getting people to participate on its Google Plus social media destination. It’s hard to tell whether or not brands are going to be able to capture the attention of consumers with these branded social hubs.
More in Marketing
Manchester City uses Fortnite to expand its global audience
As Manchester City rolls out its own Fortnite experience, it will have to contend with the fact that this brand new world does not come with a pre-existing user base. To address this problem, the company plans to leverage its network of players and talent to spread the word across their social feeds.
How Chipotle’s fighting-game-focused esports strategy is paying off at Evo 2024
In 2024, Chipotle’s choice to court the relatively niche fighting game community appears to have paid off. According to a joint study by YouGov and the agency rEvolution, which helped develop Chipotle’s gaming strategy, U.S. esports fans between the ages of 18 and 44 reported a nearly 100% increase in their intent to purchase Chipotle following the brand’s esports campaign last year.
How Revolut’s creator strategy is benefitting from YouTube’s long-form swing
The challenger bank is prioritizing YouTube creators in bid to reach consumers.