Birchbox is having a rough week.
First it was revealed that funding is drying up at the once-buzzy subscription box service, forcing it to slash 50 jobs at its New York headquarters and scale back its ambitious brick-and-mortar growth plans. Now it’s angering fans with a major devaluation to its rewards program.
In an email sent to members, Birchbox announced it is scaling back the number of points people can rack up every month. Previously, subscribers could review as many items as they wanted to in their boxes every month to receive 10 points for each item reviewed. For every 100 points collected within a year, users earned a $10 discount.
But starting on July 11, Birchbox is capping the number of items they can review to five every year, drastically reducing the number of discounts they can collect — and cutting the point expiration date from a year to just six months. However, Birchbox is dropping the 100 point minimum to cash in the points and letting people use them after collecting 10 points.
Birchbox said in a statement provided to Digiday that the changes are meant to crack down on phony reviews, while hinting that it’s meant to cut costs.
“Our customer experience is our top priority and it’s important to us to continue offering a generous loyalty program,” Birchbox said. “We’re implementing a few changes that make the program as simple and rewarding for our customers as possible, while ensuring it’s sustainable from a business perspective.”
But Birchbox’s plans alienated loyalists, who got vocal on Twitter:
— Nicole Byer (@GreenPumpkin426) June 14, 2016
If you’re looking for a good way to ruin your Tuesday, open up your email from @birchbox to see how they’re screwing their loyal customers.
— Katy Crabtree (@katycrabtree) June 14, 2016
@birchbox birchbox committed business suicide today by scraping their point system. bye bye. i am using my points & going to a competitor.
— Renee Riemke (@ReneeRiemke) June 14, 2016
Really pissed about Birchbox’s new points policy
— My Tootie (@Show_Yer_Tweets) June 15, 2016
— Kristen Cranford (@k_cran) June 14, 2016
The outrage spilled onto Birchbox’s Facebook page, too. “Your [sic] a joke keep pushing your store and screwing your subscribers you will fail,” one peeved person wrote. Another person commented that Birchbox’s changes align it with its “boring” competitors like Sephora, writing “you have to meet our loyalty with honesty and respect for us to support you.”
Marketing Briefing: Twitter, TikTok vie for ad dollars, offer incentives as they seek to own second screen for Super Bowl
While Twitter has traditionally been the platform that marketers turn to for real-time marketing efforts during the Super Bowl, the shift in leadership and advertiser exodus over the last year has left its place in this year’s Big Game a question: Will its importance continue?
Digiday+ Research: Agencies’ clients more likely to invest in CTV over traditional TV
More than two-thirds of agencies said clients spend at least a little on TV marketing, Digiday+ Research found. And they're more likely to spend on CTV than traditional TV.
How the layoffs at 100 Thieves underscore esports’ creator-executive leadership problems
Esports organizations have long been notorious for elevating professional gamers to more business-focused senior executive roles — and for suffering scandals as a result.
SponsoredAdvertising predictions that will shake up the media industry in 2023
Chris Kelly, CEO, Upwave Like many people, marketers and advertisers were ready to see 2022 come to a close. A year that started off promising was assailed by inflation, layoffs and the disastrous effects of RSV, the flu and additional COVID strains. Still, despite an uncertain outlook for 2023, there are plenty of reasons for […]
Hyatt, Lacrosse Unlimited, Lulu’s tap college athletes’ authenticity to target Gen Z
Hyatt, Lacrosse Unlimited and Lulu's are among brands highlighting partnerships with college athletes in an effort to reach new consumers, particularly those in the Gen Z cohort.
WTF is the global privacy control?
Although Do Not Track failed as an effort to make it easier for people to opt out of being tracked and targeted online, its spirit lives on in the Global Privacy Control.