Vertical Networks’ Jesus Chavez on Snapchat: ‘It’s a great place for Gen Z’
It’s been a bad year for the relationship between media companies and platforms. Those who tethered their business to platforms were especially jolted. But when it came to Snapchat, most publishers see it as a nice-to-have but not a must-have platform. But Vertical Networks, a digital content company founded by Elisabeth Murdoch, is betting on Snapchat as showing the way to the future of mobile programming.
“Snapchat is a great place for Gen Z audiences,” said Jesus Chavez, CEO of Vertical Networks on the Digiday Podcast. “Investing in a company like ours was a sign that they value premium content. We do see a great performance by our content organically with this audience. It’s a great place to create content for a Gen Z audience so it’s an important place for me to be a part of. When I think about platforms, I think what the users there are coming for and how are they discovering content. It’s a very different experience when you think about Facebook, where the majority of consumption is happening in the feed itself. On Snapchat, people come for communication and then for Discover. On Facebook, it’s about what catches your attention when you’re scrolling through, and that’s what drives the engagement. On Snapchat, people have to opt into that content. It’s driven by the platform itself.”
Chavez discusses why Snapchat remains important, why Quibi is an opportunity, and more. Edited highlights below:
Relying on a platform is a balancing act.
“The economics [of content production for platforms] can work if you have enough scale. Having said that, as you continue to invest in IP, then as a startup, you have to have a constant balancing act. You have to be profitable or stay close to profitability. If it was just social publishing, which we’ve done to date, is and can continue to be profitable on its own. The challenge with that is eventually, you’re so dependent on the platform, that as [the platform changes] it can significantly impact your profitability as a company. That’s why the IP piece if so important for us.”
Revenue streams need diversification.
[We monetize by] taking the success we had with creating content for Snapchat and leveraging that mobile IQ and expanding to other places: more platforms and brands across the board. Secondly, we believe that there will be more opportunities for mobile-specific content. Our experience in understanding the environment puts us at the forefront of these conversations. Third, is monetization. So far, most of our monetization is third-party driven. We’ve had a partnership with Fox to sell some digital revenue for us. We also get revenue from Snapchat. If we want to capture the premium value of our content and audience, then we need to have a direct arm of monetization that we built out. I’m putting together a brand partnerships team. The revenue streams will be advertising that will be platform-driven, direct and content licensing. Then we’ll start looking at direct to consumer at some point.
Platforms are not the only culprit.
I think it’s a little bit unfair to put all the blame on the platform. In any business, when you have a single line of dependency is a problem. The relationship with the platform should be twofold. There has to be a connection with the audience. The second piece is what are you able to learn from that audience that you can leverage in other places, which is why we’re working on IP. Otherwise, the platform sneezes and you catch a cold. We’re tied to Snapchat. But the good thing is the success we’ve had there shows our ability.
Quibi is a step in the right direction.
Quibi is not a rival. I see it as an opportunity. They’re building a platform that will need a lot of original content. We’re a digital studio that creates a lot of content. It would be extremely unfair to see Quibi as the litmus test for success or failure. If Quibi doesn’t work out for whatever reason, I don’t believe that means that premium content is not a good idea for mobile.
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: How the creator economy’s power balance has shifted since the era of multichannel networks
The Future of TV Briefing this week explores how the balance of power is shifting between individual video creators and the companies that have built businesses around them.
How publishers like ESPN are assessing their TikTok videos’ performance
Video makers are looking beyond standard view counts and monitoring their videos’ average completion rates, view growth rates and views from non-followers to better understand what appeals to audiences and TikTok’s algorithms.
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: How the TV ad measurement landscape has changed since summer
The Future of TV Briefing this week reviews the flurry of activity on the TV ad measurement front since the summer when the Media Rating Council stripped Nielsen of its accreditation and NBCUniversal opened the doors to alternative providers.
SponsoredHow advertisers are shifting mindsets to succeed amid iOS 15 and other identity challenges
On top of the impending cookie deprecation, Apple’s recent iOS 15 changes are causing concern for many advertisers by affecting pixels, IP addresses and email addresses. While these upcoming changes may be concerning for many, shifting mindsets and getting away from a binary way of thinking with solutions being 100% contextual or 100% universal IDs […]
Tastemade adds programs to sell and manage subscriptions, events for creators
Creators are able to sell multi-tiered subscription packages through Tastemade as well as tickets to virtual and in-person events, with 85% to 90% of revenue going to the creator.
Member ExclusiveFuture of TV Briefing: Streaming services’ subscriber growth slowed during the third quarter of 2021
The Future of TV Briefing this week looks at the broad deceleration in quarter-over-quarter streaming subscriber growth that took place over the summer into the fall.