For publishers, the post-cookies world represents an opportunity to get the upper hand
Howard Luks, Chief Revenue Officer, Eyeota
Publishers understand the immensely valuable role that they play in the media landscape, not to mention society as a whole. What is harder to see for many is the amount of power that they also hold within today’s advertising landscape — provided they know how to wield it during a time of tremendous change.
The value of first-party data and direct consumer relationships is skyrocketing as the reality of a permissioned, privacy-first digital world unfolds. In both areas, publishers have a tremendous upper hand. The challenge, of course, is that the legacy digital advertising landscape has long devalued the individual publisher’s role in the larger media ecosystem. It has typically aggregated audiences into heavily cookie-dependent targeting schema, with little consideration for the value of the content, context and publisher dynamics around which ads appear.
The loss of cookies represents a short-term monetization hurdle for publishers — and yes, it’s a significant one. But they mustn’t lose sight of the forest for the trees. The loss of cookies also represents a wholesale reinvention of a system in which publishers were not able to realize the full value of their deep audience connections. And that means there’s an opportunity to turn things around for the long haul.
Publishers hold all the cards — but they need to hold on tight
Today’s publishers own a direct relationship with consumers and participate in an overt, concrete value exchange with their audiences. In other words, users trust publishers with their personal information and give it to them knowingly because they value what they receive in return. As such, publishers represent the cornerstone of the identity ecosystem.
Moving into a cookieless world, there’s been plenty of discussion around the identity solutions that are primed to help bridge the cookie gap for marketers and advertisers. What’s not being discussed is the source of the fuel for these solutions — the authenticated audiences on which they’re built.
Where does this authentication process occur? It occurs between publishers and their readers.
Without publishers and their immensely valuable audience relationships, the identity solutions vying to fill the gap being left by cookies cannot function, much less thrive. The value exchange that occurs between publishers and their audiences is fundamental to the exchange of identity data on the open web.
Publishers must resist the urge to relinquish their upper hand in the identity game for a short-term fix to cookie deprecation — the one being proposed by many of today’s identity “solutions.” Rather than disintermediating themselves in the complicated ecosystem that exists between advertisers and consumers, they must focus on long-term opportunities rather than simply throwing their first-party data into the identity black hole and hoping enough revenue comes back to permit survival.
Publishers have the opportunity to rewrite the narrative for effective, long-term solutions
Given the erratic nature of the digital landscape over the past two decades, publishers have grown accustomed to survival mode — a mode in which every new short-term patch represents another day of business and, thus, is worthy of pursuit. But it doesn’t have to be that way. Publishers have entered a pivotal window in which they have the opportunity to rewrite their narrative so that the future becomes a known quantity and the right partnerships and data strategies can yield predictable, sustainable revenue.
Ultimately, publishers know they need to be growing their first-party data and ensuring their advertising partners can derive value from it. That means enabling a degree of interoperability across the online ecosystem. However, in making their data interoperable and more widely accessible, publishers must ensure they’re still protecting and caring for their core enterprise asset — their audience relationships.
Many emerging identity solutions offer a quick path to a semblance of data interoperability, but few represent long-term solutions that derive maximum value from a publisher’s growing first-party assets. Rather, they seek to capitalize on publishers’ short-term desperation and thereby cement themselves as long-term intermediaries in the publisher-advertiser monetization chain. But these partnerships don’t fully appreciate the powerful role of the publisher within the media value exchange.
In pivoting to a long-term sustainability mindset, publishers need to prioritize their commitment to their audiences above all. In doing so, they must seek technologies and partners that facilitate their relationships with their users, rather than disintermediating it. These technologies and partners are distinguished from short-term solutions in the following ways:
- They protect publisher revenues by ensuring publisher data continues to be available and actionable at scale.
- They enable publishers to continue to monetize their data assets when third-party cookies no longer exist.
- They ensure stable future growth of publishing businesses by making their solutions interoperable and extensible across buyer activation channels.
- Above all, they prioritize interoperability and extensibility, enabling publishers to explore a variety of identifiers and signals that can be derived directly from their first-party data.
Publishers have a brief, shining window of time where they can pivot their approaches for long-term sustainability. But to do so, they’re going to have to resist the urge to glom on to short-term, incomplete industry solutions to the immediate revenue pinch. In an industry that’s rife with companies offering crutches, it’s time to find the partners that are offering new legs.
More from Digiday
What does the Omnicom-IPG deal mean for marketing pitches and reviews?
Pitch consultants predict how the potential holdco acquisition could impact media and creative reviews heading into the new year.
AdTechChat organizers manage grievances amid fallout of controversial Xmas party
Community organizers voice regret over divisive entertainment act at London-hosted industry party, which tops a list of grievances.
X tries to win back advertisers with self-reported video stats
Is X’s big bet on video real growth or just a number’s game?