Four passes left to attend the Digiday Publishing Summit
For a 97-year-old magazine publisher, Forbes is no shrinking violet. It has gone all-in on a platform strategy that’s thrown open its site to 1,200 contributors to post directly their own articles, as well as advertisers under its four-year-old native-ad program.
To its critics, these moves spell the death knell of a storied brand. Columnist Michael Wolff recently called Forbes “an obvious fraud,” adding, “It is not a magazine or editorial operation at all. It is just, in effect, a user comment site that allows commenters the pretense of saying they have written for Forbes.” But to Forbes president and CEO Mike Perlis this is simply the evolution of a nearly 100-year-old startup.
“We think the opposite is true,” Perlis said at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, Colo. “The ability for people to be content creators is so incredibly powerful.”
And yet there are questions about quality. Forbes now boasts an audience of 28 million unique visitors per month, yet to get there it publishes up to 400 articles a day, including up to 10 posts from advertisers under the Forbes BrandVoice program.
“Forbes is very discerning, very picky and very concerned with the quality of the people who become contributors,” Perlis said. “They’re not just extra people coming to the table.”
Forbes has executed this strategy on the back of a homegrown tech platform it built with up to a dozen different components from tech vendors. Called Falcon, the content-management system powers both the Forbes contributor network and its BrandVoice native ad program. Forbes is now in talks to license the platforms to other publishers that want to follow a similar strategy.
“We want to be not just a great media company but also a great technology company,” Perlis said.
See Perlis discuss the Forbes strategy in this five-minute video interview with Digiday executive editor Brian Braiker.
More in Media
WTF is Model Context Protocol (MCP) and why should publishers care?
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a buzzword gaining more traction, especially as publishers think about how to prepare for the agentic web. WTF is it, and why should they care?
Publishers and advertisers face new AI agent oversight hurdles
Who is really in control when agents are instructing other agents, and who is accountable if they make mistakes? That question is keeping some media and ad execs up at night.
Brands turn to Discord servers as a means to reach niche influencer channels in their own ‘communities’
Discord isn’t a broadcast platform – it’s built around tight-knit servers where people spend hours chatting, sharing, and building culture.